Teams

KY/LEX/Ingram

2025 USTA SINGLES LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Men 3.5 (Singles)

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-07vs KY/LEX/OwensLost 01
L#1 SinglesStephen Schwab vs Martin Summers2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-08-28vs KY/LEX/OwensLost 03
L#1 SinglesStephen Schwab vs Jon Terry2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGene Hilton vs Martin Summers1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesShyen Shah vs Seth Garcia1-6, 2-6
2025-07-07vs KY/LEX/OwensSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNathan Begley vs Jon Terry2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesIsaac Meisner vs Jason Hawley2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-06vs KY/LEX/OwensWon 20
W#1 SinglesBraeden Janetzke vs Randall Owens6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStephen Schwab vs David Ferretti7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs KY/LEX/OwensWon 20
W#1 SinglesStephen Schwab vs Jon Terry3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDoug Campbell vs Derrick Smith7-6, 6-4
2025-06-25vs KY/LEX/OwensLost 12
L#1 SinglesNathan Begley vs Martin Summers2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesGene Hilton vs Jon Terry1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesIsaac Meisner vs Morgan Cordray6-3, 7-5
2025-06-17vs KY/LEX/OwensLost 02
L#2 SinglesJordan Gieselman vs Morgan Cordray2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesShyen Shah vs Evan Brown4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 (Singles) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Stephen Schwab
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.35
Braeden Janetzke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Doug Campbell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Isaac Meisner
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.18
Jordan Gieselman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.14
Gene Hilton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.05
Nathan Begley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.01
Dustin Ingram
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.84
Shyen Shah
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nathan Begley + Dustin Ingram123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephen Schwab
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Braeden Janetzke
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Doug Campbell
25W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Isaac Meisner
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Jordan Gieselman
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Gene Hilton
20W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Nathan Begley
30W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Dustin Ingram
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Shyen Shah
19W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.