Teams

LLW SFV PPBs/Chu/CSUN

2026 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · Spring

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-23vs Great Shots Singles/Chang-Ho/FremontSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWendy Correa vs Bianca Barredo Higgins2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHillary Williams vs Elizabeth Woo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Out of the Gate/Dobrowolski/BalboaSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWendy Correa vs Susanna Lovell1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesChristine Chu vs Elke Dobrowoslki6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Chu vs Lindsay Reid1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHillary Williams vs Liyan Wang6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesWendy Correa vs Sarah Scott6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHillary Williams vs Sheba ZamanZadeh2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesChristine Chu vs Judith Ortiz6-0, 6-4
2026-03-29vs Great Shots Singles/Chang-Ho/FremontSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDiana Guevara vs Deborah Kim4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Jin Kim6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesWendy Correa vs Denise Harris6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHillary Williams vs En Jang6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDiana Guevara vs Giovanna Insua6-7, 3-4
W#3 SinglesChristine Chu vs Sarah Scott7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesWendy Correa vs Judith Ortiz7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDiana Guevara vs Sheba ZamanZadeh3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLW SFV PPBs/Chu/CSUN6215922192
2Great Shots Singles/Chang-Ho/Fremont5318616168
33.0 Racketeers Singles/Ortiz-Bramstedt/Fremont53121227205
4Absolutely Smashing 3.0 Singles/MacEwan/Burbank2691531235
5Out of the Gate/Dobrowolski/Balboa2661838232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Desire Stephens
published 3
3.03
Wendy Correa
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
3.00
Dylan Nogay
published 3
2.85
Lourdes Duarte
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Christine Chu
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.68
Diana Guevara
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Hillary Williams
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Desire Stephens
13W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.17
Wendy Correa
10W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Dylan Nogay
81W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Christine Chu
12W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Diana Guevara
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Hillary Williams
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.