Teams

Absolutely Smashing 3.0 Singles/MacEwan/Burbank

2026 Team Singles 18+ SFV Winter · Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesAshley Bol vs Tracy Leiterman1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEn Jang vs Sheba ZamanZadeh2-6, 5-7
W#3 SinglesGiovanna Insua vs Joann Buckley Collins6-1, 6-3
2026-04-19vs LLW SFV PPBs/Chu/CSUNSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLindsay Reid vs Christine Chu6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLiyan Wang vs Hillary Williams4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesZenaida Siojo vs Sonia Chan4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMolly Jackson vs Kimberly Ndombe2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesGiovanna Insua vs Deborah Kim3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Bol vs Tressa M Dhiab7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesZenaida Siojo vs Rona Steinberg6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesMolly Jackson vs Caitlin Stacy6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMolly Jackson vs Tisha San Miguel3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-14vs LLW SFV PPBs/Chu/CSUNSplit 11
L#1 SinglesEn Jang vs Hillary Williams4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesGiovanna Insua vs Diana Guevara7-6, 4-3
L#1 SinglesLindsay Reid vs Penny Zhang4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGiovanna Insua vs Bianca Barredo Higgins1-6, 5-6
W#2 SinglesMolly Jackson vs Caitlin Stacy6-4, 4-3
W#3 SinglesGiovanna Insua vs Sarah Baldwin7-6, 2-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLW SFV PPBs/Chu/CSUN6215922192
2Great Shots Singles/Chang-Ho/Fremont5318616168
33.0 Racketeers Singles/Ortiz-Bramstedt/Fremont53121227205
4Absolutely Smashing 3.0 Singles/MacEwan/Burbank2691531235
5Out of the Gate/Dobrowolski/Balboa2661838232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lindsay Reid
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Ashley Bol
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Eliza Llobrera
published 3
2.75
En Jang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.73
Giovanna Insua
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.72
Diana Galaviz
published 3
2.66
Molly Jackson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.65
Zenaida Siojo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.38
Liyan Wang
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Reid
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Ashley Bol
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Eliza Llobrera
121W–89L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%5%
2.79
3
En Jang
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Giovanna Insua
3W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Diana Galaviz
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.72
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
Zenaida Siojo
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Liyan Wang
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.