← Search

Diana Galaviz

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Burbank, CA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
26 matches · 15W–11L · seasons 2025–2026
Match history26 matches
L
2026-02-28 · LA - Challengers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Damien Aries
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-22 · LA - Challengers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arturo Mateos
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Moffat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-02-08 · Ball Breakers/Siojo-Carlin/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with STEVEN PAUL mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-02-04 · LA - Challengers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Arturo Mateos
loading the estimate
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-25 · Ball Breakers/Siojo-Carlin/CSUN · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jorge Velasco mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-01-18 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Moffat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-17 · LA - Challengers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Kula
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-10 · Simply Smashing 7.0/Galaviz/Burbank · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gabriel Moffat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-12-07 · SFV-Simply Smashing/MacEwan · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Kennedy
loading the estimate
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-11-25 · SFV-Burbank TC/MacEwan & Makadsi · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alex Sugarman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-23 · SFV-Simply Smashing/MacEwan · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tia Ayers
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.7% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 37.3% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe