Teams

TBrooks-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Evening

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-28vs LStanek-HRWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusana Harvey / Ulrike Foley vs Kay Mabe / Mary Tusing2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Pilneyo Seo4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTraci Brooks / Kimberly Patrey vs Tracy Fletcher / Jennifer Gillie3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-04-21vs MHoward-ENOSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKelli Harris / Yvette LeGrande vs Liza Sisler / Judith Stewart4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Baxley / Lydia Pasteris vs Jane Williams / Heidi Ross3-6, 1-6
2025-04-18vs KNorris-EPHLost 02
L#2 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Terry Perrone vs Mary Jo Dunnington / Elizabeth Chan2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesUlrike Foley / Susana Harvey vs Kelsey Norris / Sarah Franks4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-04-14vs KFuller-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Oxana Gorbacheva1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTraci Brooks / Kimberly Patrey vs Karen Wood / Noreen McDonald3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-24vs LStanek-HRSplit 11
L#1 DoublesUlrike Foley / Susana Harvey vs Kay Mabe / Mary Tusing2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Anne Sherow7-5, 6-4
2025-03-17vs MHoward-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesCynthia Jones / Kimberly Patrey vs Liza Sisler / Kristal Nelson6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Tiffany Langino6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Terry Perrone vs Lisa Buyaki / Heidi Ross6-7, 4-6
2025-03-10vs KFuller-ENOLost 03
L#1 SinglesKimberly Patrey vs Oxana Gorbacheva1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Lydia Pasteris vs Leah Weinberger / Sheridan Meltsner0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSusana Harvey / Ulrike Foley vs Betsy Shane / Emily Childs3-6, 2-6
2025-02-24vs KNorris-EPHLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusana Harvey / Ulrike Foley vs Lisa Montague / Katherine Leib6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesYvette LeGrande vs Cathy Joyce5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLydia Pasteris / Kelli Harris vs Hannah White / Janelle Howard4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Jones
published 4
3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.65
Ulrike Foley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.61
Kimberly Patrey
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Yvette LeGrande
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.47
Kathryn Pollak
published
3.46
Terry Perrone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
published 3.5
3.32
Lydia Pasteris
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Sara Velarde
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Tenesha Carter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Traci Brooks
published
3.13
Kelli Harris
published
3.09
Pamela Hankerson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Angela Baxley
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Baxley + Tenesha Carter11556% games−4.0% vs expected
Angela Baxley + Traci Brooks3537% games−13.4% vs expected
Ulrike Foley + Susana Harvey7555% gamesnot enough data
Lydia Pasteris + Angela Baxley3452% gamesnot enough data
Sara Velarde + Rochelle Grieco2445% gamesnot enough data
Sara Velarde + Terry Perrone2442% gamesnot enough data
Lydia Pasteris + Kimberly Patrey5172% gamesnot enough data
Tenesha Carter + Terry Perrone4160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cynthia Jones
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.71
4
Ulrike Foley
81W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Kimberly Patrey
236W–185L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Yvette LeGrande
140W–139L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
Kathryn Pollak
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Terry Perrone
403W–263L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–186L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Lydia Pasteris
118W–96L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Sara Velarde
134W–92L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Tenesha Carter
195W–124L career · 10 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Traci Brooks
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Kelli Harris
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Pamela Hankerson
96W–202L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Angela Baxley
290W–178L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.