← Search

Pamela Hankerson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
374 matches · 121W–253L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history374 matches
L
2026-08-22 · Pa.Hankerson18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Boyce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-01 · Pa.Hankerson18C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristen Boyce
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Pa.Hankerson40T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-28 · Pa.Hankerson40T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Wooland
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley McRae
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-25 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley McRae
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-14 · Pa.Hankerson40T4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacie White
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-04 · Pa.Hankerson18T4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley McRae
loading the estimate
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
Lindy Small
2026-05-08 · Singles tourney
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-07 · Pa.Hankerson18A3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Breischaft
loading the estimate
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · Pa.Hankerson18A4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Taylor
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Pa.Hankerson18A4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley McRae
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams101 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
100%
6W–0L · 78.5% of games
3.5
42.4%
61W–83L · 48.9% of games
4.0
11.2%
10W–79L · 32.4% of games
6.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.5% of games
7.5
28.6%
12W–30L · 42.3% of games
8.5
0%
0W–13L · 15.3% of games
4.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 35.6% of games
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 23% of the time
#2 Doubles
23%
85 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
64 matches
Singles
13%
49 matches
#2 Singles
10%
39 matches
#3 Singles
7%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova