Teams

CR-DC YELLOW

2025 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-02vs RRTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesTom Jeffrey / Kelvin Southards vs Bowen Banbury / Patrick Stokes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-01vs WC PURPLEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Dyer / Mark Folsom vs Antoni Zarafonitis / Samuel Weigand6-0, 6-1
2025-08-18vs HRCA-S YELLOWSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJohn Dyer vs Spenser Johnston7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelvin Southards / Raimond Ozols vs Srinivasa Meka / Greg Todd2-6, 4-6
2025-08-11vs CCV REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Folsom / Phil Vaughan vs Adam Bogue / Peter Rogers4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMark Haverkate / Tom Jeffrey vs Gavin McCarty / Timothy Fete0-6, 4-6
2025-08-04vs SH GOLDWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Haverkate / Raimond Ozols vs Ben Hick / Jaime Beckley6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRalph Yatsko vs Mike Webb6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Dyer / Kelvin Southards vs Pete Comeau / Ari Brunschwig3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-07-28vs PRKR PURPLEWon 20
W#1 SinglesJohn Dyer vs Jeff Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelvin Southards / Mark Folsom vs Horst Kisch / Jon Pulliam6-2, 6-4
2025-07-21vs CPV GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Folsom / Phil Vaughan vs Andrew Boutilier / Jeth Harbinson3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesRalph Yatsko vs Brandon Lail5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRaimond Ozols / Tom Jeffrey vs Stefan Lanziner / Brandon Short2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CM BLACK5213821174
2PRKR PURPLE4312921168
3PH BLACK43111022183
4TTA ORANGE3491225208
5CR-DC YELLOW3491227199
6NJ GREY25101124185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
John Dyer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Kelvin Southards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Folsom
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Raimond Ozols
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ralph Yatsko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Tom Jeffrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tom Jeffrey + Kelvin Southards134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Dyer
27W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Kelvin Southards
18W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Folsom
8W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raimond Ozols
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ralph Yatsko
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Jeffrey
17W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.