Teams

GR-Ottaviani 18s 4.0W SP

2025 COASTAL PLAINS Adult 18 & OVER · 4.0 WOMEN 18 & over

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-18vs NB-Nuckolls 18s 4.0W SPWon 30
W#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Ina Jones vs Wendy Stallings / Meridith Maddox Gibbs6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRylee Greene vs Alicia Alford6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Medlin / Justine Barnes vs Jill Backer / Malin Soreff6-2, 6-2
2025-04-27vs RB - Carlson 18s 4.0WWon 41
L#1 DoublesSherry Smith / Carol Taylor vs Catherine Land / Suzan Martin6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJosie Ottaviani vs Jessie Massey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSamantha Taylor Haislip / Courtney Barnes vs Cassidy Johnson / Sharon Surles7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesIna Jones vs Kimberly Kuhn6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren Turbeville / Megan Parker vs Roberta Veluci-Marlow / Kerry Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-13vs NB-Nuckolls 18s 4.0W SPWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Brann / Ina Jones vs Hannah Mallard / Parker Honeycutt6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSamantha Taylor Haislip vs Rheagan Murphy6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Davis / Gennelle Wilson vs Sarah Corey / Middleton Hinckley6-1, 7-5
2025-04-10vs RB - Carlson 18s 4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesIna Jones / Carol Taylor vs Monica Carlson / Kimberly Kuhn6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBrooke Brann / Ani Best vs Kerry Smith / Nicole Blount1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGennelle Wilson vs Catherine Land3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHolly Medlin / Josie Ottaviani vs Jessie Massey / Roberta Veluci-Marlow6-1, 6-2
2025-04-08vs NB-Nuckolls 18s 4.0W SPWon 41
W#1 DoublesSamantha Taylor Haislip / Sherry Smith vs Helen Tyson / Alicia Alford6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAni Best vs Maggie Warren1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJill Davis / Carol Taylor vs Anne Nuckolls / Wendy Stallings6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesGennelle Wilson vs Parker Honeycutt6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMegan Parker / Lauren Turbeville vs Jill Backer / Middleton Hinckley6-2, 6-2
2025-03-27vs RB - Carlson 18s 4.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJosie Ottaviani / Ina Jones vs Eleanor Kipp / Jessie Massey6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Taylor / Megan Parker vs Monica Carlson / Michele Mayo3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesRylee Greene vs Roberta Veluci-Marlow6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Turbeville / Ani Best vs Kimberly Kuhn / Kerry Smith6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-13vs NB-Nuckolls 18s 4.0W SPWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Taylor Haislip / Brooke Brann vs Alicia Alford / Helen Tyson5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIna Jones / Justine Barnes vs Parker Honeycutt / Maggie Warren6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAni Best vs Anne Nuckolls3-6, 3-6
2025-03-09vs RB - Carlson 18s 4.0WLost 23
W#1 DoublesJill Davis / Justine Barnes vs Suzan Martin / Jessie Massey6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSamantha Taylor Haislip vs Eleanor Kipp1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Parker / Brooke Brann vs Sabrina Lentz / Monica Carlson6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLauren Turbeville vs Catherine Land3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Medlin / Courtney Barnes vs Molly Hostetler / Beth Hopkins5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Ina Jones
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.68
Josie Ottaviani
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.68
Brooke Brann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Justine Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.47
Carol Taylor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Samantha Taylor Haislip
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.38
Holly Medlin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Lauren Turbeville
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.13
Ani Best
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Gennelle Wilson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Megan Parker
published
Rylee Greene
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Josie Ottaviani + Holly Medlin3362% games+14.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ina Jones
17W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Josie Ottaviani
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.68
4
Brooke Brann
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Justine Barnes
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Carol Taylor
11W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Samantha Taylor Haislip
10W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Holly Medlin
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
Lauren Turbeville
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Ani Best
14W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Gennelle Wilson
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Parker
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rylee Greene
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.