Teams

CDTA W 18&OM4.5 8.MT Will Alex Sun 3 $24

CDTA Winter 18 & Over W · E

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesMichael Morkin / William Thornton vs Brad Takei / Zachary Thompson7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNabeel Atassi vs Ron Lorenzini2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesHarsha Namburi vs Jacob Mayles1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Katsikas vs Cameron Shulak1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Rybowiak vs Jamie Masnyk1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesMichael Morkin / John Cordogan vs Eric H Lo / Imani Crushshon7-6, 4-3
W#1 SinglesWilliam Thornton vs Ari Levy6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWilliam Alex / Peter Alex vs Ryan Rosenthal / Matthew Siami6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNabeel Atassi vs Bryan Fernley1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Ruza / Aakash Shah vs Jeff Callen / Lubos Vegh5-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesWilliam Thornton / John Cordogan vs Jonathon Schmidt / Peter Shields7-5, 4-3
L#1 SinglesAakash Shah vs Scott Williford3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNabeel Atassi / Ken Chang vs Deniz Karacay / Nick Radonjic3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Rybowiak vs Akshay Mehrotra0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMichael Morkin / Nabeel Atassi vs Joshua Luetkehans / Scott Robinson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Cordogan vs Yuto Tsukida2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Rybowiak / Ivan Svestka vs Bill Bowman / Peter Itskovich2-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Katsikas vs Ryan Nosek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMatthew Ruza / Ken Chang vs Ted Romaine / Whitney Brooks0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesPeter Alex / William Alex vs Joseph Shmigelsky / Austin Miller6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohn Katsikas vs CALEB SCHIFANO2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Morkin / Matthew Ruza vs Aleksandrs Kublinskis / Mitchell Rasley6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAndrew Rybowiak vs Manuel Brito Doerr1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNabeel Atassi / Ken Chang vs Jan Greszta / Jack Wennerstrum4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OM4.5 6.Naperville Schmidt Sat 2 $247027824271
2CDTA W 18&OM4.5 4.Wheaton Exner Sat 4 $206128718235
3CDTA W 18&OM4.5 3.Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $2243201534291
4CDTA W 18&OM4.5 5.River Trails Tranter Sun 4 $2633151532242
5CDTA W 18&OM4.5 1.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $31.534161944307
6CDTA W 18&OM4.5 2.Tam Needler Sun 7 $2225122348333
7CDTA W 18&OM4.5 8.MT Will Alex Sun 3 $241582247326
8CDTA W 18&OM4.5 7.Glenview Sternfield Sun 5 $221692654347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
John Katsikas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Aakash Shah
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Andrew Rybowiak
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Harsha Namburi
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Ivan Svestka
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
James Leto
published
John Cordogan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ken Chang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matthew Ruza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Morkin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Nabeel Atassi
usually #2 Doubles 20%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Peter Alex
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Raffay Khan
published
William Alex
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
William Thornton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Alex + William Alex6260% gamesnot enough data
Raffay Khan + Michael Morkin213 matchesnot enough data
William Thornton + John Cordogan213 matchesnot enough data
Ken Chang + Matthew Ruza033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Katsikas
17W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Aakash Shah
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Andrew Rybowiak
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Harsha Namburi
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ivan Svestka
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Leto
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Cordogan
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Chang
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Ruza
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Morkin
6W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nabeel Atassi
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Alex
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raffay Khan
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Alex
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Thornton
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.