Teams

CDTA W 18&OM4.5 7.Glenview Sternfield Sun 5 $22

CDTA Winter 18 & Over W · E

20 players · average NTRP 4.44 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesEric H Lo / Imani Crushshon vs Michael Morkin / John Cordogan6-7, 3-4
L#1 SinglesAri Levy vs William Thornton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Rosenthal / Matthew Siami vs William Alex / Peter Alex0-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBryan Fernley vs Nabeel Atassi6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Callen / Lubos Vegh vs Matthew Ruza / Aakash Shah7-5, 6-2
L#1 DoublesMichael Baddeloo / Eric H Lo vs Andrew Martin / Andrew Snyder3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMatthew Siami vs Brian Levitas3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Anglum / Jeff Callen vs Nick Werth / Rodney Berganos4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesImani Crushshon vs Ron Lorenzini6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGerald Kung / Edwin Baldwin vs Jacob Lazarus / Zachary Thompson1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesEric H Lo / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Justin Hetler / Matt Ferrante3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesImani Crushshon vs Max Crouse2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Callen / Brad Anglum vs Evan Schreiner / Jeeten Singha6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAri Levy vs Matthew Pruyn6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGary Gerstman / Ryan Rosenthal vs Robert Legg / Brent Stern6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesBryan Fernley / Eric H Lo vs Brian Sorich / Grant Gordon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMatthew Siami vs Kevin Zimmerman6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Baddeloo / Brad Anglum vs Adam Reinhart / Robert Rao1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesImani Crushshon vs Andrew Wolfberg6-2, 5-2
L#3 DoublesPedro Salomao / Lubos Vegh vs Nicholas Hebda / Adrian Ciuca4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesImani Crushshon / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Dennis Rogala / Aditya RAMANI6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Siami vs CALEB SCHIFANO4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEdwin Baldwin / Daniel Sternfield vs Joseph Shmigelsky / Konrad Siczek2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBryan Fernley vs Volodymyr Kohut4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDave Wilansk / Lubos Vegh vs Jan Greszta / Jack Wennerstrum0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDanny Resnick / Nick Charlton-Perrin vs Michael Hess / Brian Plain3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Siami vs David Jumes4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesGerald Kung / Eric H Lo vs Nhan Tran / Chris Moreno1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesImani Crushshon vs Scott Williford3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPedro Salomao / Brad Anglum vs Michael Clayborne / Nick Radonjic6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesImani Crushshon / Daniel Sternfield vs Scott Robinson / Zsolt Juhasz0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesNick Charlton-Perrin vs Ted Romaine0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEdwin Baldwin / Bill Conley vs Kevin Kamenjarin / Bill Bowman1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMatthew Siami vs Masanori Suzuki3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEric H Lo / Michael Baddeloo vs Peter Itskovich / Travis Reimers4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OM4.5 6.Naperville Schmidt Sat 2 $247027824271
2CDTA W 18&OM4.5 4.Wheaton Exner Sat 4 $206128718235
3CDTA W 18&OM4.5 3.Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $2243201534291
4CDTA W 18&OM4.5 5.River Trails Tranter Sun 4 $2633151532242
5CDTA W 18&OM4.5 1.MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $31.534161944307
6CDTA W 18&OM4.5 2.Tam Needler Sun 7 $2225122348333
7CDTA W 18&OM4.5 8.MT Will Alex Sun 3 $241582247326
8CDTA W 18&OM4.5 7.Glenview Sternfield Sun 5 $221692654347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Michael Baddeloo
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ari Levy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4.5
Bill Conley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Brad Anglum
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Danny Resnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Bryan Fernley
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.07
Matthew Siami
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
4.06
Nick Charlton-Perrin
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.05
Eric H Lo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
4.04
Imani Crushshon
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published
3.97
Jeff Callen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.89
Daniel Sternfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Lubos Vegh
published 4.5
Dave Wilansk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Edwin Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Gary Gerstman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gerald Kung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jerry Morse-Karzen
published
Pedro Salomao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ryan Rosenthal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Baddeloo + Nick Charlton-Perrin6256% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Callen + Lubos Vegh4257% gamesnot enough data
Lubos Vegh + Imani Crushshon2449% gamesnot enough data
Jeff Callen + Edwin Baldwin0531% gamesnot enough data
Michael Baddeloo + Eric H Lo1449% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Baldwin + Lubos Vegh0522% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Baldwin + Daniel Sternfield0530% gamesnot enough data
Nick Charlton-Perrin + Eric H Lo3248% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Baddeloo
40W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
4.5
Ari Levy
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Bill Conley
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Brad Anglum
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Danny Resnick
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Bryan Fernley
14W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Matthew Siami
6W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Nick Charlton-Perrin
33W–28L career · 4 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
Eric H Lo
18W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Imani Crushshon
11W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
4.04
Jeff Callen
41W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Daniel Sternfield
6W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.89
4.5
Lubos Vegh
46W–68L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
4
Dave Wilansk
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Edwin Baldwin
12W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Gary Gerstman
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Gerald Kung
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jerry Morse-Karzen
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Pedro Salomao
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Rosenthal
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.