WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Boregowda
2024 WI Tri-Level · WI Omega Doubles Men
13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WISCONSIN
Schedule8 played
i
Flight standings10 teams · WI Omega Doubles Men
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Hubbard | 9 | 0 | 11 | 180 |
| 2WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Whiteis | 7 | 2 | 24 | 221 |
| 3WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Kim | 7 | 2 | 25 | 222 |
| 4WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Boregowda | 5 | 4 | 31 | 227 |
| 5WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Antony Peter | 5 | 4 | 32 | 262 |
| 6WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Dundas | 4 | 5 | 33 | 241 |
| 7WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Isensee | 3 | 6 | 33 | 242 |
| 8WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Knutson | 3 | 6 | 37 | 270 |
| 9WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Miura | 1 | 8 | 37 | 256 |
| 10WI Tri Omega M Doubles MALT Mavlyutov | 1 | 8 | 49 | 311 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Kyle Coplan + Doy Kim | 7–3 | 58% games | +12.1% vs expected |
| Doy Kim + Jun Hyung Chang | 11–3 | 64% games | +8.3% vs expected |
| Joe Leung + Jack Brody | 6–5 | 52% games | +4.3% vs expected |
| Kyle Coplan + Michael Ohtake | 11–4 | 61% games | +3.6% vs expected |
| Jonathan Sandoval + Jun Hyung Chang | 5–5 | 51% games | +2.9% vs expected |
| Joe Leung + Hiroki Sone | 2–5 | 40% games | −2.1% vs expected |
| Jonathan Sandoval + Kyle Coplan | 4–5 | 46% games | −6.3% vs expected |
| Jonathan Sandoval + Doy Kim | 4–6 | 44% games | −8.8% vs expected |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.