Teams

Shot Show 18s

2024 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 3.92 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-26vs AlleygatorsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesBrooke Johnston / Tory Goltry vs Katherine Johnson / Kayce McEwan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren Noonan / Alexis Schwartz vs Tina Taylor / Christina Peterman5-7, 3-6
2024-06-24vs Eagle GalsLost 01
L#3 DoublesMolly Otter / Lauren Noonan vs Elizabeth Blackwell / Rhonda Curry3-6, 1-6
2024-06-19vs Tennisity 18Won 10
W#1 DoublesStella Emerson / Brooke Johnston vs Danielle Lofgren / Daniela Hefner6-4, 6-3
2024-06-17vs HillcrestWon 20
W#2 DoublesStella Emerson / Angie Magnuson vs Tina Michael / Kimberly Shansby6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSondra Power-Thornton / Tory Goltry vs Cathy Wood / Jen Hunter6-2, 6-1
2024-06-05vs BoomshakalakaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Stento / Tanya Vaughan vs Jennifer Mitchell / Lisa Hulsman4-6, 2-6
2024-06-03vs Net ResultsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTanya Vaughan / Laura Stento vs Dawn Coder / Mary Katayama3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Noonan / Sondra Power-Thornton vs Lana van Artsdalen / Jo Roby3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-05-29vs Fuzzy BallsWon 20
W#1 DoublesTory Goltry / Tanya Vaughan vs Kaitie Neely / Rachel Boren6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMolly Otter / Lauren Noonan vs Molly Henrie / Jeanna Rice6-2, 6-1
2024-05-20vs Sugar & Slice - 18Won 20
W#1 DoublesMeredith Howard / Kristie Thompson vs Leslie Koppenhafer / Kimberly Clifford7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGlory Questad / Tory Goltry vs Chelsey Melby / Heidi Stipp7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Shot Show 18s91331745398
2Alleygators82371336366
3Tennisity 1855292151447
4OverServed 18+46252558450
5Fuzzy Balls46203067487
6Sugar & Slice - 1819123879530

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Maji Daines
published 4.5
3.77
Rebecca Kochvar
published 4
3.73
Andrea Lambe
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 4
3.73
Karri Jones
published 4
3.71
Brooke Johnston
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.67
Tanya Vaughan
published 4
3.58
Angie Magnuson
published 4
3.52
3.42
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.38
Molly Otter
published 3.5
3.34
Amy Boettcher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.93
Alexis Schwartz
published 4
Glory Questad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published
Kristie Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Laura Stento
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Noonan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Meredith Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stella Emerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tory Goltry
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Hodson + Maji Daines23660% games+5.1% vs expected
Tanya Vaughan + Karri Jones9951% games−3.3% vs expected
Sondra Power-Thornton + Tanya Vaughan181350% games−3.7% vs expected
Lauren Noonan + Molly Otter261851% gamesnot enough data
Glory Questad + Angie Magnuson161650% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Vaughan + Meredith Howard101447% gamesnot enough data
Kristie Thompson + Rebecca Kochvar81050% gamesnot enough data
Kristie Thompson + Karri Jones10848% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maji Daines
145W–69L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Rebecca Kochvar
104W–62L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Karri Jones
184W–108L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brooke Johnston
20W–4L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Tanya Vaughan
148W–143L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Angie Magnuson
112W–87L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Molly Otter
133W–74L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amy Boettcher
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
4
Alexis Schwartz
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.93
Glory Questad
43W–59L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristie Thompson
36W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Stento
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Noonan
48W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meredith Howard
20W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Stella Emerson
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tory Goltry
24W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.