Teams

Lake Cane - O’Malley

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER-Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-07Won 10
W#2 SinglesJill Ata vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHazel Cooke / Kristin Skolnik vs Christine Noddings / Claire LaBrunerie6-2, 6-3
2025-02-21vs USTA Campus-VinsonWon 20
W#2 SinglesKristin Skolnik vs Susan Mclaughlin6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJill Ata / Jessica OBrien vs Leticia Monge / Janeane Vinson7-5, 6-1
2025-02-14vs Orange/Phan/18&Over3.5WLost 01
L#2 SinglesKristin Skolnik vs ROSANA MONTEIRO4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJill Ata / Jessica OBrien vs Lisa Chang / Annette Horn4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristin Skolnik vs Yuan Lentz6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-17vs USTA Campus-VinsonLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristin Skolnik vs Mary Jo Clarkson6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-01-10vs Orange/Phan/18&Over3.5WWon 10
W#1 SinglesKristin Skolnik vs KARA COGGINS6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Kate Kelley
published
3.38
Hazel Cooke
published 3.5
3.35
Jessica OBrien
published
3.34
Kristin Skolnik
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Heather Barnes
published 3.5
3.27
Karina Bezerra
published
3.27
Dena O'Malley
published 3.5
3.26
Michele Hunter
published
3.23
Daniela Campos
published 3.5
3.21
Sopit Kinakin
published
3.20
Ira Frota
published 3.5
3.12
Caroline Gardner
published 3.5
3.11
Jill Ata
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.79
Wendy Bradford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Ata + Jessica OBrien3452% games+1.9% vs expected
Daniela Campos + Ira Frota2346% games−8.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Kelley
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Hazel Cooke
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Jessica OBrien
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Kristin Skolnik
66W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Heather Barnes
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Karina Bezerra
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Dena O'Malley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Michele Hunter
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Daniela Campos
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Sopit Kinakin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Ira Frota
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Caroline Gardner
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jill Ata
102W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Wendy Bradford
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.