Teams

Orange/Phan/18&Over3.5W

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER-Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesYardise Jones / Christina Muro vs Michelle Ford / Marquita Shiever6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesROSANA MONTEIRO / Lily Kender vs Aimee Nocero / Selen Gokce1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-07vs USTA Campus-VinsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesROSANA MONTEIRO / Kelli Forgione vs Clare Bregetti / Patricia Colloca Massot7-5, 6-3
2025-02-28vs Ft Gatlin-Lewis-Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesROSANA MONTEIRO / Lily Kender vs Sherene Lewis / Cherie DePriest6-2, 6-2
W#1 DoublesChristina Muro / ROSANA MONTEIRO vs Amy Morris / Christine Noddings6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYardise Jones / Karina Viana vs Annette Horn / Shawna Tree6-2, 6-2
2025-02-14vs Lake Cane - O’MalleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaqueline Pelliccia / Erica Amadori vs Hazel Cooke / Suzanne Simpson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 DoublesLily Kender / Guledal Acikgoz Demir vs Marquita Shiever / Ronda Russell7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristina Muro vs Jenny Perdue6-1, 6-0
2025-01-31vs USTA Campus-VinsonWon 10
W#2 DoublesGabriela Barbosa / Lily Kender vs Leticia Monge / Kathy Blumentritt6-3, 7-5
2025-01-24vs Ft Gatlin-Lewis-Sweet ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesErica Amadori / Cindy Ortiz vs Suzanne Zeinfeld / Brenda Holmes6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChristina Muro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesYardise Jones / Kelli Forgione vs Jillian Baptiste / Marcia Rosman7-6, 6-3
2025-01-10vs Lake Cane - O’MalleyWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Muro / Jaqueline Pelliccia vs Heather Barnes / Suzanne Simpson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesROSANA MONTEIRO / Yardise Jones vs Jessica OBrien / Saoussane Mrini7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLily Kender / Stacey Brack vs Caroline Gardner / Jennifer Johnson6-3, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Erica Amadori
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Kelli Forgione
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Christina Muro
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Maria Cavasini
published
3.55
Cindy Ortiz
published 3.5
3.49
Stella Freeman
published
3.45
ROSANA MONTEIRO
published 3.5
3.35
KARA COGGINS
published
3.33
Yardise Jones
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Karina Viana
published
3.23
Jaqueline Pelliccia
published 3.5
3.15
Amanda Ferreira
published 3.5
3.10
Kayla Upadhyaya
published
3.06
Lily Kender
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Carrie Yoder
published 3.5
2.98
Guledal Acikgoz Demir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Ji Phan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Stacey Brack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stella Freeman + Amanda Ferreira6063% games+7.2% vs expected
Christina Muro + ROSANA MONTEIRO11756% games+4.3% vs expected
ROSANA MONTEIRO + Kelli Forgione3253% games−4.5% vs expected
Erica Amadori + Lily Kender3351% gamesnot enough data
Kelli Forgione + Yardise Jones5160% gamesnot enough data
Jaqueline Pelliccia + Yardise Jones3254% gamesnot enough data
ROSANA MONTEIRO + Lily Kender314 matchesnot enough data
Lily Kender + Stacey Brack134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Erica Amadori
117W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Kelli Forgione
237W–104L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Christina Muro
110W–61L career · 9 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Maria Cavasini
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Cindy Ortiz
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.55
Stella Freeman
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
ROSANA MONTEIRO
114W–55L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
KARA COGGINS
29W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Yardise Jones
142W–78L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Karina Viana
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jaqueline Pelliccia
67W–53L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amanda Ferreira
17W–3L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
Kayla Upadhyaya
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lily Kender
63W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carrie Yoder
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
3.5
Guledal Acikgoz Demir
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Ji Phan
12W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Stacey Brack
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.