Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2025 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-02vs Sports Mall-Eckert/MortensenWon 10
W#1 DoublesNooshin Prasthofer / Lisa Pappas vs Chelsea Spencer / Stephanie Morris6-4, 7-6
2025-05-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesMaureen Russo / Lisa Pappas vs Linda Lasater / Alessandra Huamani7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-05-12vs Utah/Kesler/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesKalaiselvi Seetharaman / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Marieke Timmer / Emily Hepworth2-6, 0-6
2025-05-05vs Cottonwood Club-Nielsen/BarberSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKalaiselvi Seetharaman / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Mikelle Moore / Kristina Maljovec4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCari Johnson / Lisa Pappas vs Jamie Tate / Sara Turley6-3, 6-2
2025-05-03vs South Jordan-RoseLost 12
W#1 DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman vs Christina Jones / Demarest Kenrick6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Pappas / Cari Johnson vs Konni Ford / Mariam Azin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMiranda Tilley / Natasha Plyer vs Katie Rose / Emily Burgess2-6, 3-6
2025-04-28vs Salt Lake Tennis-LeathamWon 10
W#3 DoublesKalaiselvi Seetharaman / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Karla Block / Emily Herring6-1, 6-2
2025-04-21vs Sunpro-Waite/CollinsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMiranda Tilley / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman vs Carolyn Woods / Sue Ellen Vincent6-0, 6-4
2025-04-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesCari Johnson / Lisa Pappas vs Wendy Johnstun / Michelle Simmons7-6, 6-2
2025-04-12vs Park City MARC-JacobsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKalaiselvi Seetharaman / KayeLynn BASTIAN vs Nancy Holloway / Janna Mann6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Miranda Tilley
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Jennifer Wily
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3
2.84
Rebecca Harman
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
2.84
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Natasha Plyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Gelyn Pauly
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
Alisa White
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.74
Jocelyn Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.73
Cari Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.68
Maureen Russo
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 61%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Pappas
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.48
Joann Kuncewitch
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.31
Mari Bickmore
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
Kristen Logan
published
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cari Johnson + Lisa Pappas5259% games+4.8% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Wily + Delia Bayna14554% games+1.7% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Rebecca Harman4357% games−0.0% vs expected
Gelyn Pauly + Miranda Tilley174139% games−0.1% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Lisa Pappas2348% games−0.5% vs expected
Jocelyn Pearson + Maureen Russo121447% games−2.2% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + KayeLynn BASTIAN192450% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Miranda Tilley
35W–76L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Jennifer Wily
119W–177L career · 15 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Rebecca Harman
244W–303L career · 14 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
82W–91L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Natasha Plyer
22W–49L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Gelyn Pauly
50W–93L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Alisa White
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Jocelyn Pearson
59W–79L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Maureen Russo
40W–75L career · 12 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 18 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 11 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Lisa Pappas
30W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
Joann Kuncewitch
15W–39L career · 10 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
3
Mari Bickmore
87W–239L career · type A · 9 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.31
Kristen Logan
25W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
98W–124L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.