Teams

SSC Roses

2023 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 8.5 W Thursday

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-30vs Payne Park WilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Rose / Lisa Temple vs Mary Wilson / Sue Green2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTracy Fang / Mary Alice Hillier vs Sally Alford / Lisa Klemeyer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-11-29vs LWR SharksLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Alice Hillier / Tracy Fang vs Christie Boylston / Karen Nicholson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Rose / Lisa Temple vs Sheila Perry / Elizabeth Green5-7, 1-6
2023-11-09vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracy Fang / Mary Alice Hillier vs Maureen Thomas / Tracy Mediratta6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Rose / Donna Mink vs Christine Vecchione / Cynthia Horton6-4, 6-4
2023-10-26vs Payne Park WilsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Alice Hillier / Tracy Fang vs Mary Wilson / Sue Green6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonna Mink / Michele Rose vs Kara Beene / Jane Doe3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-12vs LWR SharksLost 02
L#1 DoublesTracy Fang / Lisa Temple vs Gina Hagopian / Allyson Hoffman0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Park / Cristina Tomadin vs Christie Boylston / Karen Nicholson0-6, 3-6
2023-10-05vs Cedars Island Girls 8.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichele Rose / Donna Mink vs Wendy Hillock / Kimberly Johnston7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Alice Hillier / Tracy Fang vs Yuka Pearl / Cherie Lopez6-2, 6-3
2023-10-03vs Sarasota/Deuitch/50&Over8.5WWon 10
W#3 DoublesTracy Fang / Mary Alice Hillier vs Lynn Deuitch / Connie Weiss6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Tracy Fang
published
4.02
Michele Rose
published
3.86
Tambra Ford
published 4
3.78
Donna Mink
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Susan Rakay
published 4
3.77
Cristina Tomadin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Mary Alice Hillier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Lisa Temple
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Marsha Timm
published
3.61
Ann Davy
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Mink + Susan Rakay2447% gamesnot enough data
Susan Rakay + Lisa Temple134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Fang
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
4.21
Michele Rose
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
4.02
4
Tambra Ford
106W–93L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Donna Mink
107W–70L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Susan Rakay
35W–26L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%5%
3.78
4
Cristina Tomadin
266W–200L career · 1 line in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Mary Alice Hillier
79W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Lisa Temple
83W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Marsha Timm
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Ann Davy
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.