Teams

Jones/18/7.5/BC

2023 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Bridgette Taylor
published 4
3.38
Celeste Collins
published 3.5
3.19
Bridget Ory
published 3.5
3.06
Alixe Pizzo
published 3.5
2.95
Alison Beebe
published 3
Erinn Legendre
published
Heather Vinet Jones
published
Katherine Hodgins
published
Lindsay Johnson
published
Michelle Pecoraro
published
Rebecca MacMaster
published
Violeta Daskalova
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Taylor + Celeste Collins2447% gamesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Heather Vinet Jones3248% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Pecoraro + Celeste Collins2343% gamesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Bridgette Taylor134 matchesnot enough data
Violeta Daskalova + Celeste Collins314 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca MacMaster + Katherine Hodgins314 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hodgins + Alison Beebe224 matchesnot enough data
Erinn Legendre + Bridgette Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridgette Taylor
14W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Celeste Collins
32W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Bridget Ory
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Alixe Pizzo
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Alison Beebe
54W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Erinn Legendre
22W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Heather Vinet Jones
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katherine Hodgins
25W–18L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsay Johnson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Pecoraro
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca MacMaster
13W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Violeta Daskalova
35W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.