Teams

Post-Rust/McGill-DFC

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-30vs KPollak-ENOSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Kathryn Pollak6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesChrista McGill vs Anna Brown6-2, 6-3
2025-06-23vs HRoss-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Valerie Acre4-6, 4-6
2025-06-16vs KPollak-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Button Hall6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Anna Brown6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs CCouto-HRLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmanda Lacoff vs Mary Feger2-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs CYu2-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Katie Evans6-1, 6-2
2025-05-25vs CYu-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesChrista McGill vs Briana Oliver0-6, 0-6
2025-05-19vs MLong-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesChrista McGill vs Dallas Knight6-0, 6-4
2025-05-05vs SFranks-ENOWon 20
W#2 SinglesDayna Kelly vs Liz Chen6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesChrista McGill vs Keshia Green6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Dayna Kelly
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.78
Elizabeth McNamara
published
3.66
Amanda Lacoff
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.65
Amber Richardson
published 4
3.65
Susie Post-Rust
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.58
Christa McGill
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.07
Melissa Daubert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dayna Kelly + Christa McGill8358% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dayna Kelly
126W–99L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
Elizabeth McNamara
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Amanda Lacoff
189W–114L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Amber Richardson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–93L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Christa McGill
119W–123L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.58
Melissa Daubert
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.