Teams

GEPTA/Michnovicz/40&overMX/7.0

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 2024 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Michnovicz/40&overMX/7.09126412186
2GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Estrada)(EPTC#2)91191126261
3GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Pendergras)(EPCC#1)73181231274
4GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Orozco)(TW)55151536285
5GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Jones)(EPTC#1)36111637256
6GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Avila)(FB)37121842306
7GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Woo)(EPTC#3)28111942305
8GEPTA-7.0-Mx-40(Garcia)(EPCC#2)1852245291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Darren James
usually #2 Doubles 27%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.26
David Coyle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.88
Andrew Michnovicz
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
Gail Richardson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Janet Treon
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jennifer Bush
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
John Trujillo
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
Linda Rowse
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 12% · published
Luis Morales
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Patrick Morandi
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Pete Dinger
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Sintra Sampath
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Victor Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sintra Sampath + Darren James8262% gamesnot enough data
Victor Ruiz + Linda Rowse9066% gamesnot enough data
Gail Richardson + Paciencia Comon-Pearce4356% gamesnot enough data
Linda Rowse + Sintra Sampath7069% gamesnot enough data
Linda Rowse + Janet Treon6170% gamesnot enough data
Sintra Sampath + John Trujillo4356% gamesnot enough data
Gail Richardson + Darren James4255% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Bush + David Coyle5158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darren James
56W–48L career · 24 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
David Coyle
27W–23L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Andrew Michnovicz
108W–70L career · 24 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Gail Richardson
31W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Janet Treon
33W–34L career · 20 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Bush
71W–79L career · 24 lines in 2024
not enough data
John Trujillo
36W–27L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Rowse
41W–17L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Luis Morales
53W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paciencia Comon-Pearce
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick Morandi
22W–15L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pete Dinger
24W–16L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sintra Sampath
74W–34L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victor Ruiz
34W–6L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.