Teams

GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Jones)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 3.69 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · 2024 USA MIXED 40 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Michnovicz/40&overMX/7.09126412186
2GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Estrada)(EPTC#2)91191126261
3GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Pendergras)(EPCC#1)73181231274
4GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Orozco)(TW)55151536285
5GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Jones)(EPTC#1)36111637256
6GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Avila)(FB)37121842306
7GEPTA-7.0-MX-40(Woo)(EPTC#3)28111942305
8GEPTA-7.0-Mx-40(Garcia)(EPCC#2)1852245291

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Alejandra Ostos
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
GUADALUPE CAZARES
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.64
Bianca Loya
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published 4
3.38
Alexandra Ortiz
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.38
Enrique Mata
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 24% · published 3.5
ALMA HERRERA
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 3.5
3.25
FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Bertha Gutierrez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Jose Gabilondo
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lori DeLisser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Randi Cabrera
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Ray Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bertha Gutierrez + Alexandra Ortiz1545% gamesnot enough data
Lori DeLisser + FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ314 matchesnot enough data
Jose Gabilondo + FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alejandra Ostos
51W–13L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
GUADALUPE CAZARES
9W–7L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Bianca Loya
42W–32L career · 19 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Alexandra Ortiz
34W–36L career · 14 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Enrique Mata
58W–110L career · 32 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
ALMA HERRERA
23W–15L career · 29 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
FRANCISCO JAVIER IGLESIAS LOPEZ
21W–14L career · 18 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bertha Gutierrez
47W–69L career · 10 lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.13
Jose Gabilondo
13W–6L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori DeLisser
94W–74L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data
Randi Cabrera
55W–66L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Bonds
67W–58L career · 36 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.