Teams

ARAGON HS 40AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#3 DoublesTerri Champ / Sha Klabunde vs Kirsten Frietzsche / Nancy Miyasaki4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-15vs BAY CLUB REDWOOD SHORES 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesSha Klabunde / Donelle Paisley vs Sally Randall / Elizabeth Torrelio3-6, 0-6
2023-03-04vs GOLDEN GATEWY 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Liu / Sha Klabunde vs Lorie Lambert / Mimi Lim4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSha Klabunde / Donelle Paisley vs Allison Don / Elaine Ikeda4-6, 2-6
2023-02-18vs SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40AW4.0BLost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Liu / Sha Klabunde vs Yoko Borchelt / Jane Doe6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-12vs COLONY CLUB 40AW4.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJin Young Hong / Sha Klabunde vs Serene Lai / Mila Paul6-3, 0-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Margo Dhaliwal
published
3.89
Michele Brown
published
3.80
Donelle Paisley
published
3.76
Wendy Gee
published
3.74
Sha Klabunde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Donna Blyshak
published
3.63
Vivian Gabel
published
3.62
Leyla Scott
published
3.59
Aviva Levine
published 4
3.14
Denise Dinsmore
published 3.5
Jennifer Midori Yan
published
Linda S Walker
published
Lisa Jaffe
published
Mary Liu
published
Stacey McCutcheon
published
Susan Stulz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Blyshak + Vivian Gabel5553% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margo Dhaliwal
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.93
Michele Brown
20W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.89
Donelle Paisley
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Wendy Gee
19W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Sha Klabunde
41W–44L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Donna Blyshak
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.70
Vivian Gabel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Leyla Scott
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Aviva Levine
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Denise Dinsmore
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Jennifer Midori Yan
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda S Walker
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Jaffe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Liu
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacey McCutcheon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Stulz
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.