Teams

Rockwall GAC/Kruse M3.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-19vs Huffhines/Hoang-Yeoh M3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesShawn Kruse vs Philip Blum2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMike Spruill / Chris Nuytten vs Chris Kittrell / Farjad Baig4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Holcomb / Brad Rich vs Alejandro Gallardo / Harper Lucas2-6, 2-6
2025-10-12vs SpringPark/Nolen BLUE M3.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesMike Spruill / Chris Nuytten vs Kenn Jones / Juan M Perez Palacios1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAdam Sensoy / Robert Holcomb vs Andrew Jornod / Jeff Bass6-1, 7-5
2025-10-05vs The Lakes TA/Smith-Leach M3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesSam Carns / John Brummett vs James Lynn / Philip Hane6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteve Arkell / Mike Spruill vs Burke McDavid / Mark Kim6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChris Nuytten / Shawn Kruse vs Zachary Zendejas / Jaye Hohman2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJohn Brummett / Sam Carns vs John Pesano / Steve Chapman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShawn Kruse / Randy Bezet vs Gregory Mccown / Tim Thorson6-3, 6-1
2025-09-21vs DAC/Tolley-Basden M3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Brummett / Adam Sensoy vs Ian Fairchild / Alan Morris6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesShawn Kruse vs Drew Mooney6-0, 6-3
2025-09-14vs Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesShawn Kruse vs Collin Dawson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Brummett / Sam Carns vs Ryan Flynn / Colin Kane6-3, 6-1
2025-09-07vs Canyon Creek/Erdmann-Romness M3.0Lost 03
L#1 SinglesShawn Kruse vs Dylan Neal0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRhett Bredy / John Brummett vs David Romness / MICHAEL ERDMANN3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Sensoy / Chris Nuytten vs Christopher Abel / Magnus Aronsson0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Huffhines/Hoang-Yeoh M3.0702539139
2Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.052181022206
3LB Houston/Ramirez M3.053201231273
4The Nelson/Puklicz M3.053181434299
5The Lakes TA/Smith-Leach M3.043181024225
6Canyon Creek/Erdmann-Romness M3.043171124198
7Rockwall GAC/Kruse M3.043141431230
8Gleneagles/Merrill-Thomson M3.044141839281
9Huffhines/Bonarji-Yeoh M3.035151737290
10SpringPark/Nolen RED M3.035131942324
11DAC/Tolley-Basden M3.02582040268
12Stonebridge Ranch/Gregg-Smith M3.01672144289
13SpringPark/Nolen BLUE M3.01652346295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Mike Spruill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Sam Carns
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
2.92
Randy Bezet
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.87
John Brummett
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Brad Rich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Steve Arkell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Trey DeMoville
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.71
Shawn Kruse
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Rhett Bredy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Charles Landry
published 3
2.48
Chris Nuytten
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
Adam Sensoy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Robert Holcomb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sam Carns + Steve Arkell4449% gamesnot enough data
Rhett Bredy + Randy Bezet1738% gamesnot enough data
Steve Arkell + John Brummett4165% gamesnot enough data
Sam Carns + Trey DeMoville224 matchesnot enough data
Sam Carns + John Brummett314 matchesnot enough data
Rhett Bredy + Trey DeMoville134 matchesnot enough data
Chris Nuytten + Trey DeMoville224 matchesnot enough data
Steve Arkell + Mike Spruill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Spruill
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Sam Carns
18W–23L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Randy Bezet
17W–31L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.92
John Brummett
16W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Brad Rich
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Steve Arkell
17W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Trey DeMoville
10W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Shawn Kruse
11W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Rhett Bredy
6W–29L career · 8 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Charles Landry
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Chris Nuytten
6W–20L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Adam Sensoy
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
Robert Holcomb
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.