Teams

The Nelson/Puklicz M3.0

2026 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-09vs Huffhines/Bonarji-Yeoh M3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs Ameya Hegiste6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesStephen Lasner / Eliot Kerlin vs Deep Kumar Muthu / Ryan Blackburn6-2, 6-4
2025-11-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDiego Estrada / Victor Abraham vs Scott Shanes / Ross Curtis4-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs LB Houston/Ramirez M3.0Lost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs Marvin Diaz6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDiego Estrada / Joseph Nelson vs Andres Beteta / Edgar Pena Salazar4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoel DSouza / John Perry vs Harry Shah / Jeet Zalavadia3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-12vs SpringPark/Nolen RED M3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs Brian Hauberg1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Lasner / Victor Abraham vs John Masten / Chip Hodge6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn Perry / Joel DSouza vs Mark Bailey / Lance Westbrook6-3, 6-1
2025-10-05vs Huffhines/Bonarji-Yeoh M3.0Split 11
W#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs Ameya Hegiste6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRyan Windham / John Perry vs Eoin Treacy / Alexander Heng4-6, 2-6
2025-09-28vs Gleneagles/Merrill-Thomson M3.0Won 20
W#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs James Priebe6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDiego Estrada / Joel DSouza vs Todd Shores / John Roach4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-09-21vs LB Houston/Ramirez M3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs ERIC GARCIA6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Taffe / Eliot Kerlin vs Edgar Pena Salazar / Nykolas Alford6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesVictor Abraham / Diego Estrada vs Rick Chevalier / Harry Shah6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-07vs SpringPark/Nolen RED M3.0Split 11
L#1 SinglesAndrew Nevin vs Brian Hauberg7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoel DSouza / Diego Estrada vs Chip Hodge / Jeff Mussro6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · A 18 & over ADULT M. Fall League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Huffhines/Hoang-Yeoh M3.0702539139
2Brookhaven/Frenkel M3.052181022206
3LB Houston/Ramirez M3.053201231273
4The Nelson/Puklicz M3.053181434299
5The Lakes TA/Smith-Leach M3.043181024225
6Canyon Creek/Erdmann-Romness M3.043171124198
7Rockwall GAC/Kruse M3.043141431230
8Gleneagles/Merrill-Thomson M3.044141839281
9Huffhines/Bonarji-Yeoh M3.035151737290
10SpringPark/Nolen RED M3.035131942324
11DAC/Tolley-Basden M3.02582040268
12Stonebridge Ranch/Gregg-Smith M3.01672144289
13SpringPark/Nolen BLUE M3.01652346295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Matt Brendel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.20
Mike Dunlap
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Eliot Kerlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Andrew Nevin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.91
Stephen Lasner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Joel DSouza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
David Taffe
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.79
Diego Estrada
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Greg Puklicz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.74
Victor Abraham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
John Perry
published 3
2.68
Ryan Windham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Nelson
published
Leo Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Taffe + Greg Puklicz1443% gamesnot enough data
Joel DSouza + John Perry224 matchesnot enough data
Victor Abraham + Diego Estrada033 matchesnot enough data
Eliot Kerlin + Stephen Lasner123 matchesnot enough data
Stephen Lasner + Diego Estrada123 matchesnot enough data
Mike Dunlap + Leo Park213 matchesnot enough data
Joel DSouza + Diego Estrada213 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Windham + John Perry033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Brendel
23W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Mike Dunlap
14W–14L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Eliot Kerlin
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
3
Andrew Nevin
16W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
Stephen Lasner
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Joel DSouza
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
3
David Taffe
13W–24L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Diego Estrada
8W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Greg Puklicz
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Victor Abraham
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
John Perry
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Ryan Windham
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Joseph Nelson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Leo Park
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.