← Teams

CAC-Hunter/Day

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Tami McAra
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Singles 7% · published 4
3.36
Michele Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Chikako Hokanson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Gina Ariosa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Nozomi Bray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results18 ties
2019-09-29Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Angela Byrum / Esther Kim6-3, 6-1
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Carrie Perry / Michelle Glenn7-6, 7-6
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Nancy Bashey / Stacia Hammond6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2019-09-28Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Mary Pat Mansfield / Sally Martin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2019-08-18Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Sarah Yu / Leah Buxman6-4, 7-6
2019-08-18Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Tarynn Berkman / Sarah Ferrer7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2019-08-17Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Danielle Barrett / Jennifer Lucas6-4, 6-2
2019-07-12Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesItsuko Day / Michele Snyder vs Judi Babcock / Shannon Roarke6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTami McAra vs Ann Skoog7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Lucas / Nozomi Bray vs Kristi Tompkins / Christine Moran6-2, 7-5
2019-03-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Tina Farrelly / Jennifer Scott6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChikako Hokanson / Nozomi Bray vs Morganne Hatfield / Melody Wang6-1, 6-4
2019-03-17Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesNozomi Bray / Kathryn Bustle vs Loo Yah Leong / Mary Lowblad6-4, 7-6
2019-03-17Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Martin Jeffrey Binns vs Laura Maginnis / Joe Warner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTami McAra / Charles Eastwood vs Alison Davis / Frank Foti2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-03-16Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Vivian Nguyen / Sheila McCarroll3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2019-03-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMartin Jeffrey Binns / Michele Snyder vs Roger Gwin / Karen Walker6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCharles Eastwood / Tami McAra vs Rich Johnson / Mary Chennault6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2019-02-24Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Kathleen Sullivan vs Lisa Wisthoff / Patricia Sturr6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTami McAra vs Beth Ruff6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNozomi Bray / Natalya Ramras vs Eleanor Zawada / Shelley Kolb7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2019-02-02Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesNozomi Bray / Chikako Hokanson vs Dar Dragoon / Garrene Mcgale6-4, 6-1
2019-01-26Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesNozomi Bray / Chikako Hokanson vs Jamie Heberlein / Woohyung Kim6-3, 6-4
2019-01-12Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Snyder / Tami McAra vs Nicole Floyd / Annette Hill6-3, 6-3
2019-01-04Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesTami McAra / Michele Snyder vs Lisa Wisthoff / Traina Giles6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesGina Ariosa / Kathleen Sullivan vs Shelley Kolb / Joanne Smith6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tami McAra
148W–117L career
6%94%0%
3.63
3.5
Michele Snyder
149W–123L career
0%97%2%
3.36
3.5
Chikako Hokanson
26W–28L career
3%96%1%
3.24
3
Gina Ariosa
24W–46L career
0%80%20%
2.96
3
Nozomi Bray
60W–110L career
0%99%1%
2.83

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.