Search

Gina Ariosa

PORTLAND, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
70 matches · 24W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
71%
stay 3.0
29%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
PORTLAND · 3.0
6 of 15
OR · 3.0
170 of 600

Gina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams103 teams · 2001–2026
THPRD-Reese/Ellis
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2026
THPRD-Ellis/Murrin
2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2026
THPRD-Reese/Ellis
2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
THPRD-Ellis/Murrin
2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
CRRC-Franke/Walker
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
THPRD-Reese/Ellis
2024 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gina has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Gina has gone from the 15th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
26.3%
5W–14L · 41% of games
7.0
38%
19W–31L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-02-20 · THPRD-Ellis/Murrin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betty Roux
0.007about as expected — took 45% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-23 · THPRD-Ellis/Murrin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Shier
0.002below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-11-14 · THPRD-Reese/Ellis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sharon Reese
0.042below expectation — took 43% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-10-26 · THPRD-Reese/Ellis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeny Joseph
0.031below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-10-11 · THPRD-Reese/Ellis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernadette Lisac
+0.049better than expected — took 75% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-05-06 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Franke
+0.008better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Pat Berends / Victoria Rigby
2025-04-22 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Spencer
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-17 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Roche
+0.044better than expected — took 50% of games against 33% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-04-04 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Walker
0.071below expectation — took 0% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-03-18 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Spencer
0.018below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-03-16 · THPRD-Ellis/Murrin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Kempton
0.022below expectation — took 35% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-03-13 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Spencer
0.001about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.