Search

Donna Walker

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
50 matches · 12W–38L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
10%
stay 3.0
90%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 52% stay · 48% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.00. Lower than today’s 3.10 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 3.0
35 of 357
OR · 3.0
61 of 600

Donna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams71 teams · 2001–2026
CRRC-Mosbrucker
2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women
2026
CRRC-Franke/Walker
2025 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2025
CRRC-Glenn(s)
2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2025
LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen
2025 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2025
LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen
2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women
2024
CRRC-Franke/Walker
2024 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Women
2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Donna has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
12.5%
3W–21L · 34.4% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 65.1% of games
7.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 36.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history50 matches
W
2025-11-30 · CRRC-Mosbrucker · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Glenn
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-5
W
Shelley Hutley / Holly Weyhrauch
2025-11-15 · CRRC-Mosbrucker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Hayes
0.006about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-11-09 · CRRC-Mosbrucker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicola Ash
+0.048better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
1-3
W
Jane Crisan / Catherine Kubik
2025-09-12 · CRRC-Mosbrucker · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carol Glenn
+0.042better than expected — took 100% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-06-21 · LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Newcomb
0.010below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Anita Rockwell / Loo Yah Leong
2025-05-10 · LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trina Newcomb
0.039below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Judy Hamilton / Deborah Rhoades
2025-05-06 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Noriko Dozono
+0.015better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-05-04 · CRRC-Glenn(s) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wes Milligan
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-05-03 · LOTC-McCarter/Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan McCarter
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-01 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendie Nowacki
0.024below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-22 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wendie Nowacki
+0.002about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-04-17 · CRRC-Franke/Walker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Spencer
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.