Teams

2*JYoung-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-30vs 3*YDeaver-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Diane Allen2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Bay Scott6-2, 6-3
2024-07-23Won 20
W#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Debbie Baker7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Kay Sharpe6-2, 6-1
2024-07-09vs 3*YDeaver-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Yolanda Deaver4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Kellianne White3-6, 2-6
2024-07-02vs 1*DBaker-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Becki Cleveland6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Jane Stewart6-2, 7-5
2024-06-18vs 3*YDeaver-EnoSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Kellianne White1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJonda Young vs Bay Scott6-1, 7-6
2024-06-11Lost 12
L#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Leslie Jackson3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Debbie Baker0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Jane Stewart6-2, 6-4
2024-05-28vs 3*YDeaver-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Bay Scott6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJonda Young vs Edith Becerra6-0, 7-5
2024-05-21vs 1*DBaker-EnoWon 21
L#1 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Leslie Jackson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMeta Kuehn vs Janet Ranheim6-0, 7-5
W#3 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Debbie Baker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Meta Kuehn
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.78
Camille Blommer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.62
Matalaba Napier
published
2.54
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.36
Vickie Gibbs
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonda Young + Pamela Howell-Davis2637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Meta Kuehn
64W–113L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Camille Blommer
73W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Matalaba Napier
11W–21L career · no lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
119W–146L career · 3 lines in 2024
38%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.36
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
54W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.