Teams

3*YDeaver-Eno

2024 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-30vs 2*JYoung-EnoSplit 11
L#2 SinglesBay Scott vs Vickie Gibbs2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Jennifer Huggins4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-07-27vs 1*DBaker-EnoLost 01
L#1 SinglesBay Scott vs Becki Cleveland4-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs 2*JYoung-EnoWon 30
W#1 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Camille Blommer6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKellianne White vs Pamela Howell-Davis6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBay Scott vs Jennifer Huggins6-3, 6-4
2024-06-25Won 10
W#3 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Jane Stewart6-2, 6-3
2024-06-18vs 2*JYoung-EnoSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKellianne White vs Camille Blommer6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesBay Scott vs Jonda Young1-6, 6-7
2024-06-04vs 1*DBaker-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Leslie Jackson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKellianne White vs Becki Cleveland6-4, 6-4
2024-05-28vs 2*JYoung-EnoLost 02
L#1 SinglesBay Scott vs Meta Kuehn2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Jonda Young0-6, 5-7
2024-05-24vs 1*DBaker-EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Janet Ranheim5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Yolanda Deaver
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.14
Kellianne White
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.80
Edith Becerra
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.64
Kellie Johnson
published
2.40
Bay Scott
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yolanda Deaver + Kellianne White5552% gamesnot enough data
Yolanda Deaver + Edith Becerra224 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Yolanda Deaver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yolanda Deaver
203W–94L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
3
Kellianne White
171W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.14
3
Edith Becerra
35W–27L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Kellie Johnson
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%16%84%
2.64
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.