Teams

GR-Haislip 18S 4.0M SP

2025 COASTAL PLAINS Adult 18 & OVER · 4.0 MEN 18 & over

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-28vs BW - Toler (18s 4.0 M)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesTJ Thomas / Jeff Gravelin vs Graham Toler / Stuart Whitehead2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMatt Turbeville vs Mark Gerhart2-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs BW - Toler (18s 4.0 M)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJonathan Tribula / Jeff Gravelin vs Kevin Wiggs / Mark Gerhart7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTyler Haislip / Corey Fader vs Graham Toler / Stuart Whitehead3-6, 6-7
2025-04-14vs BW - Toler (18s 4.0 M)Won 21
W#1 DoublesJeremiah Montgomery / TJ Thomas vs Kevin Wiggs / Stuart Whitehead6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesTyler Haislip vs Jay Wilkins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCorey Fader / Matt Turbeville vs Andy Varnell / John Turner5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs BW - Toler (18s 4.0 M)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJeff Gravelin / Tyler Haislip vs Jonathan Taylor / Rick Martin2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoshua Cash vs Nate Turner4-6, 2-6
2025-03-17vs BW - Toler (18s 4.0 M)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMatt Turbeville / Colby Chase vs Graham Toler / Jonathan Taylor6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJonathan Tribula / TJ Thomas vs Kevin Wiggs / Stuart Whitehead6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 MEN 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Colby Chase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Corey Fader
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Jeremiah Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Jonathan Tribula
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Matt Turbeville
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.46
TJ Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Tyler Haislip
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.27
Jeff Gravelin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joshua Cash
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colby Chase
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Corey Fader
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeremiah Montgomery
35W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jonathan Tribula
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Matt Turbeville
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
TJ Thomas
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.46
Tyler Haislip
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Jeff Gravelin
20W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Joshua Cash
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.