Teams

KY/BG/VILINES

2026 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over -BG · 3.5 SR WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-02vs KY/BG/SPEARSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoan Douglas / RHONDA HOWARD vs Melissa Marr / Jennifer Holmes6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCheryl Hensel / Elaine Vilines vs Charlotte Napier / April Harris2-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs KY/BG/SPEARSLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Leonard / Paula Edwards vs Melissa Marr / Penney Baseheart1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Belt / Joan Douglas vs Ann Spears / Tricia Sanders0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGay Suiter / Tammy Salada vs Donna Alderson / Karen Kineman7-6, 6-4
2026-04-18vs KY/BG/SPEARSLost 02
L#1 DoublesRHONDA HOWARD / Joan Douglas vs Melissa Marr / Jennifer Holmes4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Hensel / Elaine Vilines vs April Harris / Charlotte Napier3-6, 3-6
2026-04-11vs KY/BG/SPEARSLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Leonard / Paula Edwards vs Melissa Marr / Penney Baseheart1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Belt / Joan Douglas vs Ann Spears / Tricia Sanders1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesGay Suiter / Tammy Salada vs Donna Alderson / Karen Kineman7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 SR WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
RHONDA HOWARD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Joan Douglas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Gay Suiter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Tammy Salada
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Paula Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Cheryl Hensel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.04
Elaine Vilines
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Kathy Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Janice Belt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Gloria Neal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Belt + Paula Edwards6168% games+10.2% vs expected
Elaine Vilines + Cheryl Hensel044 matchesnot enough data
Paula Edwards + Kathy Leonard044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

RHONDA HOWARD
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Joan Douglas
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Gay Suiter
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Tammy Salada
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Paula Edwards
28W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Cheryl Hensel
12W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
Elaine Vilines
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kathy Leonard
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
2.85
Janice Belt
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Gloria Neal
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.