Teams

KY/BG/SPEARS

2026 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over -BG · 3.5 SR WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-02vs KY/BG/VILINESSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Marr / Jennifer Holmes vs Joan Douglas / RHONDA HOWARD4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCharlotte Napier / April Harris vs Cheryl Hensel / Elaine Vilines6-2, 6-2
2026-04-25vs KY/BG/VILINESWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Marr / Penney Baseheart vs Kathy Leonard / Paula Edwards6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Spears / Tricia Sanders vs Janice Belt / Joan Douglas6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Alderson / Karen Kineman vs Gay Suiter / Tammy Salada6-7, 4-6
2026-04-18vs KY/BG/VILINESWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Marr / Jennifer Holmes vs RHONDA HOWARD / Joan Douglas6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesApril Harris / Charlotte Napier vs Cheryl Hensel / Elaine Vilines6-3, 6-3
2026-04-11vs KY/BG/VILINESWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa Marr / Penney Baseheart vs Kathy Leonard / Paula Edwards6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Spears / Tricia Sanders vs Janice Belt / Joan Douglas6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Alderson / Karen Kineman vs Gay Suiter / Tammy Salada6-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 SR WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Ann Spears
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Penney Baseheart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Charlotte Napier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Melissa Marr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Tricia Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Karen Kineman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kelly Bingle
published
2.81
Donna Alderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Marr + Penney Baseheart404 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Bingle + Karen Kineman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Spears
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Penney Baseheart
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Charlotte Napier
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Melissa Marr
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Tricia Sanders
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Karen Kineman
10W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.12
Kelly Bingle
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Donna Alderson
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.