Teams

Templin-Love All

2022 One Doubles- Summer · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-04vs Strueby/LarsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusanna Buttorff / Stacie Nemetz vs Annamarie Larson / Lee Ann Strueby0-6, 2-6
2022-07-25vs Fourtner-Wise AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Bennett / Julie Templin vs Michele Capestany / Rachelle Ames2-6, 1-6
2022-07-24vs Strueby/LarsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Quesada / Stacie Nemetz vs Annamarie Larson / Lee Ann Strueby1-6, 2-6
2022-07-17vs Gano-Sweet ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusanna Buttorff / Anne Bennett vs Ellen Stagnone / Catherine Goerig5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-12vs Gano-Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesNoel Abrams / Stacie Nemetz vs Angela Gano / Ellen Stagnone6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-27vs Fourtner-Wise AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Quesada / Julie Templin vs Michele Capestany / Kristen Fourtner2-6, 2-6
2022-06-22vs Smith-Summer "Love"Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSusanna Buttorff / Anne Bennett vs Gretchen Leanderson / Lisa Smith2-6, 3-6
2022-06-13vs Smith-Summer "Love"Won 10
W#1 DoublesNoel Abrams / Julie Templin vs Karen Jones / Jennifer Stockstad6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Strueby/Larson7171348
2Gano-Sweet Shots6262665
3Fourtner-Wise Aces4444969
4Templin-Love All26261387
5Smith-Summer "Love"17171490

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Susanna Buttorff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Noel Abrams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Anne Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Stacie Nemetz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Julie Quesada
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Julie Templin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Nemetz + Julie Quesada101645% games−3.5% vs expected
Susanna Buttorff + Anne Bennett1444% games−6.5% vs expected
Stacie Nemetz + Julie Templin224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Templin + Noel Abrams314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Templin + Julie Quesada123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susanna Buttorff
67W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Noel Abrams
78W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Anne Bennett
45W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Stacie Nemetz
53W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Julie Quesada
27W–50L career · 2 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Julie Templin
44W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.