Teams

OC Lifetime RSC - Kathy

2022 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

22 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesStephanie Colson / Tania Reed vs Susie Kim / Carol Jacobs3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-26vs OC Great Park - TanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Brooks / Marianne Richards vs Miyu Davis / Kaeko Jenni7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephanie Colson / Tania Reed vs Christina Tan / Elizabeth Hogan6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesMarianne Richards / Christine Reenders vs Sabrina MacLachlan / Hina Khan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-29vs OC El Dorado -SusieWon 10
W#1 DoublesNina Ames / Marianne Richards vs Allison Yabroff / Rebecca Schrock6-0, 6-1
2022-07-22vs OC Great Park - TanWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Colson / Dewi Johnson vs Susan Tan / Isabelle Krenz6-1, 6-0
2022-07-15vs OC LLW CMTC - NicoleLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Colson / Rosalyn Kleiman vs Brittany Nevins / Kim Schattinger4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
3.84
Gabrielle Hansen
published 4
3.83
Marianne Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Schetman
published 4
3.64
Michelle Duenas
published
3.55
Tania Reed
published
3.51
Nina Ames
published
3.45
Gina Lukes
published 3.5
3.39
Samantha Ackad
published
3.37
Barbara Springer
published 3.5
3.30
Stephanie Colson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Chrissy Bird
published 3.5
3.21
Sophie Sanchez
published
3.13
MeganMary Mills
published
3.00
Mariah Velasco
published
2.96
Jeanette Delaney
published
2.82
Dawn Currie
published 3
2.75
Lois Russell
published
2.74
Lauren Leabody
published
Rosalyn Kleiman
published
Traci Streets
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanette Delaney + Mariah Velasco8359% games+6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christine Reenders
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
4.08
4
Gabrielle Hansen
16W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Marianne Richards
98W–77L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Amy Schetman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Duenas
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Tania Reed
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Nina Ames
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Gina Lukes
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
Samantha Ackad
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Barbara Springer
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Stephanie Colson
41W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Chrissy Bird
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Sophie Sanchez
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
MeganMary Mills
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.13
Mariah Velasco
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.00
Jeanette Delaney
24W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Dawn Currie
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Lois Russell
16W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Sharron Elias-Calles
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Lauren Leabody
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosalyn Kleiman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Traci Streets
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.