Teams

OC Great Park - Tan

2022 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

9 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-18vs OC The Huntington Club - JoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hogan / Kristen Petrovacki vs Michelle Bachand / Cheryl Gates5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Tan / Isabelle Krenz vs Michelle Schmit / Lacey Seward3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-17vs OC El Dorado -SusieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIsabelle Krenz / Susan Tan vs Grace Mulligan / Lesley Nishigawara6-4, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Miyu Davis vs Rebecca Schrock / Kathalena Cocker6-3, 6-1
2022-08-26vs OC Lifetime RSC - KathySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMiyu Davis / Kaeko Jenni vs Susan Brooks / Marianne Richards6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesChristina Tan / Elizabeth Hogan vs Stephanie Colson / Tania Reed4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-29vs OC LLW Cute On The Court - LPC - MakSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Miyu Davis vs Hatien Nguyen / Stacy Tzur7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Tan / Kaeko Jenni vs Nicole Doan / Cecilia Hoang2-6, 4-6
2022-07-22vs OC Lifetime RSC - KathyLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristina Tan / Kaeko Jenni vs Michelle Duenas / Amy Schetman5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Tan / Isabelle Krenz vs Stephanie Colson / Dewi Johnson1-6, 0-6
2022-07-15vs OC The Huntington Club - JoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMiyu Davis / Christina Tan vs Emalyn Anthony / Laurette Jennings2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Kaeko Jenni
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Isabelle Krenz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Christina Tan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Dawn Shapiro
published 3.5
3.08
Cynthia Branch
published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Hogan
published 3.5
2.84
Suzi Kim
published
Susan Tan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kaeko Jenni + Christina Tan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Petrovacki
134W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.94
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
94W–89L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Isabelle Krenz
43W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Christina Tan
10W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cynthia Branch
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Elizabeth Hogan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.07
Suzi Kim
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.84
Susan Tan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.