Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Jo

2022 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-18vs OC Great Park - TanLost 01
L#3 DoublesMichelle Schmit / Lacey Seward vs Susan Tan / Isabelle Krenz6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-09-16vs OC LPC - Blanco/MouttapaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Bachand / Rosalinda Fazio vs Kim O'Neil / Cheryl Smith5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLacey Seward / Alicia Logan vs Jill Brown / Kristi Wechsler6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-26vs OC El Dorado -SusieWon 10
W#3 DoublesLacey Seward / Theresa Dubourdieu vs Toni Guastella / Kristin Powers6-2, 6-1
2022-08-12vs OC LLW Cute On The Court - LPC - MakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaurette Jennings / Emalyn Anthony vs Cheryl Smith / Sabrina MacLachlan5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLacey Seward / Alicia Logan vs Jill Brown / CHERIE SHARP7-6, 6-4
2022-08-05vs OC Lifetime RSC - KathySplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Cheryl Gates vs Michelle Duenas / Kathleen Waite7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLacey Seward / Michelle Schmit vs Chrissy Bird / MeganMary Mills4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-07-15vs OC Great Park - TanWon 20
W#1 DoublesEmalyn Anthony / Laurette Jennings vs Miyu Davis / Christina Tan6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlicia Logan / Lacey Seward vs Dawn Shapiro / Susan Tan6-0, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Emalyn Anthony
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.81
Cheryl Gates
published 4
3.60
Kelly Lombardo
published
3.57
Shelly Hilliard
published
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Lacey Seward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Alicia Logan
published 3.5
3.42
Josephine Garrett
published
3.36
Michaela Vitrano
published
3.33
Jacqueline Jernigan
published 3.5
3.19
Samantha Bloom
published
2.73
Michelle Schmit
published
2.63
Theresa Dubourdieu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosalinda Fazio + Alicia Logan2332% gamesnot enough data
Josephine Garrett + Kelly Lombardo044 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Jernigan + Alicia Logan134 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Dubourdieu + Michelle Schmit224 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Logan + Michaela Vitrano404 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Lacey Seward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Emalyn Anthony
107W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Kelly Lombardo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Shelly Hilliard
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 1 line in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Lacey Seward
95W–62L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Alicia Logan
48W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.44
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Michaela Vitrano
12W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Jacqueline Jernigan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Samantha Bloom
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Michelle Schmit
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Theresa Dubourdieu
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.