Teams

Something About Mary

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

16 players · average NTRP 3.73 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Elwer / Lori Layne vs Lisa Diehr / Becky Caven4-6, 5-7
2025-06-24vs Sister SqadSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Cowley / Christina Floyd vs Lisa Diehr / Becky Caven5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Elwer / Lori Layne vs Terry Hardy / Katherine Johnson6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Christina Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Kimberly Cowley
published 4
3.70
Lori Layne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Chureena Looney
published 4
3.61
Christine Elwer
published 4
3.57
Mary Burke
published 4
3.45
Dawn Crochet
published 3.5
3.28
Mary Chodroff
published 3.5
3.28
Fariss Mcgee
published 3.5
3.22
Kelly Loeb
published
3.21
Adrianne Fisher
published 3.5
3.07
Cassie Swanson
published 3.5
3.06
Mary Adcox
published 3.5
3.05
Angel Marie Bowie
published 3.5
Jacqueline Gunn
published
Vicki Osweiler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Burke + Dawn Crochet13956% games+6.3% vs expected
Dawn Crochet + Christine Elwer5549% games+2.6% vs expected
Fariss Mcgee + Dawn Crochet171452% games+0.1% vs expected
Mary Burke + Mary Adcox111750% games−1.3% vs expected
Mary Chodroff + Mary Adcox111646% games−1.9% vs expected
Kimberly Cowley + Christina Floyd21042% games−3.5% vs expected
Mary Adcox + Dawn Crochet4949% games−4.0% vs expected
Christina Floyd + Lori Layne4453% games−8.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Floyd
53W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Kimberly Cowley
140W–95L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Lori Layne
32W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Chureena Looney
47W–56L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Christine Elwer
156W–133L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Mary Burke
151W–102L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dawn Crochet
163W–176L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Mary Chodroff
115W–104L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Fariss Mcgee
79W–93L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Kelly Loeb
91W–100L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Adrianne Fisher
85W–72L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Cassie Swanson
95W–108L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Mary Adcox
150W–194L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Angel Marie Bowie
24W–44L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jacqueline Gunn
30W–24L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Vicki Osweiler
21W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.