Teams

Creighton Farms 3.0 Rowley

2024 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-21vs Furgal - Orange Crush- Ida LeeWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Hannah Auyang6-3, 5-5
W#2 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Jennifer Annessa6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2024-10-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Jill Vaughan6-7, 5-5
2024-10-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Jill Vaughan3-6, 6-7
2024-10-03vs WilsonWon 20
W#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Peggah Wilson6-7, 6-4
W#3 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Kayla Broussard6-1, 6-0
2024-10-03vs Aldridge - StoneleighWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Tamra Howard-McAtee6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Debora Aldridge6-0, 6-3
2024-09-17vs WilsonWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Karin Arnold6-3, 6-6
2024-09-12vs Furgal - Orange Crush- Ida LeeWon 21
W#1 SinglesAfsoun Semsar vs Caroline Hedges7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesKelly Rowley vs Jennifer Annessa2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 SinglesStacy Mowry vs Stephanie Frauen6-3, 6-4
2024-09-10vs Aldridge - StoneleighWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Mccarter vs Melissa Haugh6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Stacy Mowry
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.35
Jamie Davis
published
3.33
Carolyn Mccarter
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Erin Burnett
published
3.30
Kelly Rowley
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Afsoun Semsar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.14
Tamara Hurney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Rowley + Stacy Mowry9062% games+10.8% vs expected
Kelly Rowley + Carolyn Mccarter4260% games+10.6% vs expected
Carolyn Mccarter + Erin Burnett404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Stacy Mowry
86W–19L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.57
Jamie Davis
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Mccarter
89W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Erin Burnett
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Kelly Rowley
65W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Afsoun Semsar
44W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
Tamara Hurney
3W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.