Teams

LoVV 6.0W

2024 Prince Georges Adult 18-39 · Prince Georges 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.14 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-03vs Racqueteers 6.0WSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesColleen Quinlan / Dhivya Rani Shankaran vs Marissa Schmauch Womble / Calle Cone6-3, 6-2
L#2 Female DoublesEsme Rogers / Jinyoung Sohn vs Andrea Torres / Ayanna Charles6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-25vs Racqueteers 6.0WWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesColleen Quinlan / Dhivya Rani Shankaran vs Marissa Schmauch Womble / Ayanna Charles6-3, 6-2
W#3 Female DoublesJinyoung Sohn / Esme Rogers vs Calle Cone / Tetiana Vagizova6-4, 6-1
2024-07-07vs Racqueteers 6.0WSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesBrittany Jennings / Dhivya Rani Shankaran vs Tetiana Vagizova / Ayanna Charles6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 Female DoublesSHAMEKA JENNINGS / Elyse Morris vs Marissa Schmauch Womble / Andrea Torres1-6, 2-6
2024-06-30vs Racqueteers 6.0WLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesDhivya Rani Shankaran / Elyse Morris vs Marissa Schmauch Womble / Andrea Torres3-6, 4-6
2024-06-23vs Racqueteers 6.0WWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesDhivya Rani Shankaran / Jinyoung Sohn vs Kara Stegeman / Jasmine Miles7-5, 6-3
W#2 Female DoublesElyse Morris / Colleen Quinlan vs Andrea Torres / Courtney Johnson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Prince Georges 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Gabriella Snead
published
3.29
Jinyoung Sohn
usually #1 Female Doubles 33%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Colleen Quinlan
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Naomi Hall
published
2.79
SHAMEKA JENNINGS
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
2.73
Esme Rogers
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Dhivya Rani Shankaran
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Tammie Wiley
published 3
Jennifer Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gabriella Snead + Naomi Hall4258% games−2.3% vs expected
Dhivya Rani Shankaran + SHAMEKA JENNINGS314 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Jennings + Dhivya Rani Shankaran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriella Snead
17W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Jinyoung Sohn
93W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Colleen Quinlan
118W–96L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Naomi Hall
34W–20L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
SHAMEKA JENNINGS
85W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Brittany Jennings
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Esme Rogers
48W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Dhivya Rani Shankaran
32W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Tammie Wiley
81W–67L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
Jennifer Brooks
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.