Teams

Highland Park - Shea

2024 B'ham Combo - Adult 18 & Over Women Weekday · 8.5 Tuesday Morning

14 players · average NTRP 4.20 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-13vs Hoover Met - BOWDENWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrandie Hunter / Maggie Misner vs Leah Taylor / Lani Perrigo6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-08-06vs Hoover Met - DuckLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaggie Misner / Mallie Whatley vs Heidi Gobbels / Suzette Pflaum2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-30vs Greystone YMCA - BakerWon 10
W#2 DoublesErica Williams / Maggie Misner vs Kelli Baker / Laura Nevill6-3, 6-3
2024-07-23vs Vestavia Country Club - CaudellWon 10
W#2 DoublesErica Williams / Maggie Misner vs Jordan Caudell / Shelby Wright7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Tuesday Morning have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Brandi Patterson
published 4.5
4.11
Kat Rogers
published
4.06
Carol Hinson
published 4.5
4.05
Nicole Jordan
published
3.91
Mallie Whatley
published
3.88
Maggie Misner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Beth Shea
published 4
3.77
Kim Payne
published
3.76
Brandie Hunter
published 4
3.72
Frances Wang
published
3.70
Stephanie Hester
published
3.65
Elizabeth Gilmer
published
3.48
Lauren Tanner
published
Erica Williams
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandi Patterson + Nicole Jordan5259% games+16.4% vs expected
Stephanie Hester + Frances Wang5451% games−1.7% vs expected
Beth Shea + Lauren Tanner213 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Misner + Kat Rogers123 matchesnot enough data
Maggie Misner + Lauren Tanner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandi Patterson
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.38
Kat Rogers
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
4.11
4.5
Carol Hinson
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
4.06
Nicole Jordan
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Mallie Whatley
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Maggie Misner
74W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Beth Shea
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Kim Payne
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Brandie Hunter
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Frances Wang
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Stephanie Hester
14W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Elizabeth Gilmer
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.65
Lauren Tanner
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.48
Erica Williams
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.