Teams

Marco Ymca - Conte

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Joyce Hail vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-02-28vs Pelican Bay North - BehmaramLost 01
L#2 DoublesBetsy Conte / Susan Juels vs Toni Marie Silverman / Sue Malek2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-14vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnu Whitelocke / Mary Pavichevich vs Lisa Byanski / Gail Oroho2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-02-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnu Whitelocke / Mary Pavichevich vs Dawn DeDomenico / Debra Gardner Hussey1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-24vs The Quarry - R. BlackLost 01
L#3 DoublesPattie Yergler / Betsy Conte vs Lynn Croteau / Anna Dean1-6, 4-6
2024-01-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBetsy Conte / Pattie Yergler vs Colleen Bresson / Melissa Bailey3-6, 6-7
2024-01-10vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 01
L#1 DoublesPattie Yergler / Mary Pavichevich vs Carol Cohen / Rosemary Rolak0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Trina Clarkson
published
3.31
Susan Juels
published
3.30
Anu Whitelocke
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Linda Streett
published
3.21
Pattie Yergler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Jan Jackman
published
3.16
Sally Mattke
published
3.16
Marla Hoffman
published
3.05
Mary Pavichevich
published
3.03
Joyce Hail
published
Betsy Conte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pattie Yergler + Betsy Conte6654% gamesnot enough data
Jan Jackman + Marla Hoffman044 matchesnot enough data
Marla Hoffman + Mary Pavichevich134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trina Clarkson
34W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.52
Susan Juels
11W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Anu Whitelocke
74W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Linda Streett
8W–11L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Pattie Yergler
220W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Jan Jackman
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Sally Mattke
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Marla Hoffman
36W–34L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16
Mary Pavichevich
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.05
Joyce Hail
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Betsy Conte
212W–172L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.