Teams

Olde Cypress - Loomis

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.55 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-28vs Talis Park - Hurt-SimmonsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDenise Reilly / Kelly Deufel vs Liane Joseph / Barbara Hurt-Simmons5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Kirsch / Audra DiDonato vs Elaine Morrison / Hillary Facchina6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Cheryl Rauch vs Sharon Sturges / Susie Beaudet3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Deufel / Denise Reilly vs Gabriela Chahwan / Angela Ricci6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-02-14vs The Quarry - R. BlackLost 13
L#1 DoublesDenise Reilly / Kelly Deufel vs Patty Ciolfi / Angela Knapp2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTamara Blanco vs Elena Marina0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFlora Loomis / Nora Slusar vs Laura Bertolo / Jennifer Kaufman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Cook / Audra DiDonato vs Linda Togias / Allison McEvoy6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-07vs Ritz Tiburon - J. BrownLost 02
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Kirsch / Denise Reilly vs Christine Siciliano / Jennifer Brown4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFlora Loomis / Katherine Morehead vs Megumi Yoshida / Christie Albrite2-6, 6-7
2024-01-31vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFlora Loomis / Denise Reilly vs Sonja Pound / Cyndee Verhelle6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAudra DiDonato / Heather Cook vs Sara Martineson / Patty McManus6-3, 6-2
2024-01-24vs Marco YMCA - D. BurschSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Tamara Blanco vs Dana Sacks / Ricki Giersch1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFlora Loomis / Suzanne Kirsch vs Dana Bursch / Inge Lund7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2024-01-17vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsWon 31
W#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Suzanne Kirsch vs SUE BECK / Amy Schiffer2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTamara Blanco vs Mary Beth Harley6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Kelly Deufel vs Alexandrina Covato / Margaret Laggis6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFlora Loomis / Katherine Morehead vs Marcia Kenyon / Kellie Wagner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-01-10vs Marco Ymca - ConteSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMarlea Bowser / Cheryl Rauch vs Melissa Henderson / Marla Hoffman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAudra DiDonato / Holly Gwaltney vs Susan Juels / Linda Streett1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Carol Cohen
published 4
3.50
Suzanne Kirsch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Rosemary Rolak
published
3.31
Flora Loomis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Denise Reilly
published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Marlea Bowser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Katherine Morehead
published
3.21
Nora Slusar
published
3.18
Tamara Blanco
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Heather Cook
published 3.5
3.14
Audra DiDonato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Kelly Deufel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Flora Loomis + Suzanne Kirsch4356% games+6.5% vs expected
Audra DiDonato + Suzanne Kirsch262251% games+2.3% vs expected
Rosemary Rolak + Nora Slusar5347% games−3.3% vs expected
Marlea Bowser + Cheryl Rauch8352% gamesnot enough data
Marlea Bowser + Kelly Deufel5256% gamesnot enough data
Tamara Blanco + Marlea Bowser123 matchesnot enough data
Marlea Bowser + Flora Loomis033 matchesnot enough data
Flora Loomis + Kelly Deufel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Cohen
26W–25L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Suzanne Kirsch
95W–69L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Rosemary Rolak
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Flora Loomis
89W–102L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%92%8%
3.31
3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Marlea Bowser
168W–139L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.25
Katherine Morehead
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.24
Nora Slusar
17W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Tamara Blanco
42W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Heather Cook
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Audra DiDonato
94W–159L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Kelly Deufel
89W–134L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.