Teams

Marco YMCA - D. Bursch

2024 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-02-28vs GreyHawk - LaFontaineSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLisa Campbell / Ricki Giersch vs Gail Oroho / Leslie Martin6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Breault / Dana Bursch vs Maria Lafontaine / Cyndee Verhelle6-7, 6-7
2024-02-21vs Pelican Bay North - BehmaramLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Sacks / Jacqueline Heise vs Dawn Cyr / Tami Turner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Campbell / Dana Bursch vs Toni Marie Silverman / Amy Enxing3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDeb Dorsey / Renee Facciola vs Lisa McCarthy / Nancy Hughes6-1, 6-4
2024-02-13vs Sterling Oaks - AldermanWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Heise / Dana Sacks vs Elizabeth Coates / Amy McHale6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Julich / Kathryn Breault vs Lynda Giannetta / Jennifer Heimmel6-2, 6-0
2024-02-07vs The Quarry - R. BlackLost 12
L#1 DoublesRenee Facciola / Susan Julich vs Angela Knapp / Jennifer Kaufman1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Elena Marina2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRicki Giersch / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Anna Dean / Regina Black6-4, 7-5
2024-01-31vs Ritz Tiburon - J. BrownLost 12
L#1 DoublesRenee Facciola / Jacqueline Heise vs Christine Siciliano / Jocie Jandovitz6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Campbell / Dana Sacks vs Marina Eschoyez-Quiroga / Nikki Miller6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathryn Breault / Jennifer Stonebreaker vs Rachel Goode / Lynn Mariotti4-6, 5-7
2024-01-24vs Olde Cypress - LoomisLost 03
L#1 DoublesRenee Facciola / Jacqueline Heise vs Rosemary Rolak / Carol Cohen6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Katherine Morehead6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDana Sacks / Ricki Giersch vs Marlea Bowser / Tamara Blanco6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesRicki Giersch / Dana Sacks vs Susie Beaudet / Sharon Sturges7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Susan Seeley4-6, 4-6
2024-01-10vs Village Walk Bonita - MacwilliamsWon 21
W#1 SinglesAna Cecilia Isaza vs Alexandrina Covato6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Campbell / Inge Lund vs Sigalit Sphatt / Marcia Erpenbeck7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDana Bursch / Kathryn Breault vs Marcia Kenyon / Katherine MacWilliams6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Inge Lund
published 4
3.59
Renee Facciola
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Dana Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.50
Tricia McBride
published
3.50
Kathryn Breault
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Ana Cecilia Isaza
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Lisa Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Susan Julich
published
3.39
Ricki Giersch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Karen Correa
published
3.30
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.30
Jacqueline Heise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Dana Bursch
published 3.5
3.27
Jennifer Stonebreaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Breault + Dana Bursch6261% games+3.0% vs expected
Ricki Giersch + Susan Julich5553% games−0.3% vs expected
Lisa Campbell + Dana Sacks14954% games−4.0% vs expected
Ricki Giersch + Dana Sacks451857% games−4.3% vs expected
Kathryn Breault + Renee Facciola3350% games−7.0% vs expected
Lisa Campbell + Inge Lund4158% games−7.9% vs expected
Lisa Campbell + Renee Facciola11758% gamesnot enough data
Ricki Giersch + Renee Facciola7357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Renee Facciola
164W–112L career · 4 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Dana Sacks
218W–149L career · 5 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Tricia McBride
12W–28L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.50
Kathryn Breault
161W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Ana Cecilia Isaza
200W–102L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Lisa Campbell
131W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
Susan Julich
26W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Ricki Giersch
139W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Karen Correa
15W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jacqueline Heise
162W–149L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Dana Bursch
46W–45L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Jennifer Stonebreaker
42W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.