Teams

LLW-CV-Shadow Mt/N Cooper & S Nickerson

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Becky Jones vs Jill Wright / Elaine Reddick-Cooley2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBecky Jones / Camille Elliott vs Betsy Michel / Heather Black6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanice Malos / Mei Leckenby vs Elaine Reddick-Cooley / Jill Wright0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Becky Jones vs Susan Waugh / Donna Butters6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJanice Malos / Mei Leckenby vs Carmen Nokes / PALMIERI PALMIERI6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Leda Potente / Roberta Stone6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCamille Elliott / Julie Vila vs Brooke Hodge / Kathleen Webb6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCamille Elliott / Becky Jones vs Katherine Misskelley / Roberta Stone7-6, 7-5
W#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Becky Jones vs Betsy Michel / Heather Black6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Jill Wright / Maggie Maita7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-01-30Won 20
W#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Sherri Nickerson vs Pamela Borman / Donna Butters6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJanice Malos / Nicole Popper vs Joanne Pastula / Deborah Masoncup6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Carina Bloj / Jennifer Bouffard6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCamille Elliott / Becky Jones vs Linda Clark / Katherine Misskelley6-2, 6-2
2022-01-16Split 11
L#1 DoublesMei Leckenby / Janice Malos vs Susan Costa / Donna Butters6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSherri Nickerson / Camille Elliott vs Pamela Borman / Carmen Nokes6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Julie Vila
published
3.33
Becky Jones
published 3.5
3.11
Camille Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Stephania Denton
published
2.85
Eileen Martin
published 3
Faith Ricciuti
published 3
Janice Malos
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Mei Leckenby
published
Nicole Popper
published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Vila
7W–20L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Becky Jones
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 9 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Stephania Denton
16W–23L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Eileen Martin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Faith Ricciuti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Janice Malos
29W–58L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mei Leckenby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nicole Popper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.