Teams

LA - Sets on Fire 9.0

2025 USTA MxD 18 & Over - LA · LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles

23 players · average NTRP 4.56 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-22vs LA - BHTC WarriorsWon 20
W#2 DoublesCharles Barrantes / Darcy Simon vs Stephanie Russell / Aaron Abrams6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesApril Hartstein / JASON FREEDMAN vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-16vs LA - Different Strokes 9.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKelly Kenney / Charles Barrantes vs Ashley Lin / Joshua Quijano2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Castillo / Darcy Simon vs Shaurya Dhankar / Mimi Hua7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesApril Hartstein / JASON FREEDMAN vs Leonardo Kim / Jenna Parker6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs LA - LATC AlchemyWon 20
W#2 DoublesDavid Castillo / Darcy Simon vs Joshua Gurevich / Krista Bissell6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKate Horiuchi / Eugene Tran vs Jennifer Lichtman / James Mason6-2, 7-6
L#1 DoublesDaniel Hermosisima / Jordan Hickey vs Maggie Dudeck / Chris Dudeck4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCameron Coe / Kate Horiuchi vs Andrew Clayton / Donna Shin7-6, 7-5
W#1 DoublesMandi Collier / Bryson Lee vs Lauren DiFazio / Hirsch Matani6-3, 6-2
2025-02-16vs LA - Different Strokes 9.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Hermosisima / Julie Flygare vs Shaurya Dhankar / Liz Sanchez4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBryson Lee / VICKY TRINH vs Ashley Lin / Kwins Yang7-5, 6-2
2025-02-15vs LA - LATC AlchemyWon 10
W#3 DoublesBryson Lee / Mandi Collier vs Bess Kargman / James Mason6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - 9.0 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.72
Cameron Coe
published 5
4.69
Mandi Collier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.57
Aki Eguchi
published 5
4.49
Darcy Simon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
Chandler Nguyen
published 4.5
4.37
Alexander Wood
published 4.5
4.34
Bryson Lee
published 4.5
4.29
April Hartstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Daniel Hermosisima
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Benjamin Stork
published 4.5
4.21
Eugene Tran
published
4.18
Charles Barrantes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Chloe Kishel
published 4.5
4.12
Shanna Reznik
published
4.10
Kate Horiuchi
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
4.02
Amit Gupta
published 5
3.95
Julie Flygare
published
3.86
Kelly Kenney
published
3.78
VICKY TRINH
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Kelly Moss
published
3.71
Dave Kang
published 4
JASON FREEDMAN
published
Matthew Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Hartstein + Mandi Collier7165% gamesnot enough data
VICKY TRINH + Charles Barrantes6151% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Hermosisima + Charles Barrantes2352% gamesnot enough data
April Hartstein + Julie Flygare314 matchesnot enough data
Dave Kang + Aki Eguchi123 matchesnot enough data
Mandi Collier + Darcy Simon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cameron Coe
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Mandi Collier
188W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
5
Aki Eguchi
166W–100L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
5
Darcy Simon
96W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Chandler Nguyen
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Alexander Wood
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
4.5
Bryson Lee
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
4.34
4.5
April Hartstein
227W–139L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
Daniel Hermosisima
44W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Benjamin Stork
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eugene Tran
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
4.21
4.5
Charles Barrantes
138W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
Chloe Kishel
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
4.13
Shanna Reznik
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
4
Kate Horiuchi
54W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
4.10
5
Amit Gupta
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.02
Julie Flygare
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
Kelly Kenney
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.86
4
VICKY TRINH
163W–101L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Kelly Moss
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Dave Kang
138W–129L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
JASON FREEDMAN
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Matthew Craig
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.