Teams

Martin - Lawn & Tennis 4.0/3.5/3.0

2023 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-07-13vs Harris - Lawn & TennisWon 10
W#2 DoublesSajata Strong / Mary Hannah Vaughan vs Charlotte Gallagher / Mary Howard6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Katrina Bullard
published
3.66
Susan Omell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.65
Joy Martin
published
3.62
Christina Powers
published 4
3.54
Mary Hannah Vaughan
published
3.46
Anneliese Carr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Amity Aldridge
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.32
Sajata Strong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jenifir Bruno
published
3.11
Kathy Fick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.90
Corinna Williamson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Megan Hunt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amity Aldridge + Sajata Strong8553% games−1.1% vs expected
Joy Martin + Susan Omell4646% games−4.2% vs expected
Katrina Bullard + Susan Omell7252% games−13.6% vs expected
Susan Omell + Sajata Strong8847% gamesnot enough data
Amity Aldridge + Katrina Bullard6357% gamesnot enough data
Anneliese Carr + Susan Omell5350% gamesnot enough data
Corinna Williamson + Kathy Fick2546% gamesnot enough data
Amity Aldridge + Susan Omell5254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katrina Bullard
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Susan Omell
189W–247L career · 14 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.66
Joy Martin
57W–78L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Christina Powers
31W–41L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Mary Hannah Vaughan
29W–27L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Anneliese Carr
87W–100L career · 8 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
3.46
3.5
Amity Aldridge
113W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Sajata Strong
108W–87L career · 1 line in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jenifir Bruno
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Kathy Fick
126W–95L career · 8 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
3
Corinna Williamson
122W–100L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
Megan Hunt
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.