Teams

Harris - Lawn & Tennis

2023 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-27vs Osterman - Lawn & TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Hercules / Lynn Goldhammer vs Jen Barton / Kimberlee Carter0-6, 2-6
2023-07-20vs Voltz PCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Florell / Gaye Saunders vs Kimberly Brooks / Renee Ference3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-07-13vs Martin - Lawn & Tennis 4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Florell / Lori Hercules vs Jenifir Bruno / Lynne McDonough2-6, 3-6
2023-07-02vs McClymont - CCNC 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesGaye Saunders / Amy Hastings vs Meagan Lee / Caroline Parks6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-15vs Osterman - Lawn & TennisLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Florell / Gaye Saunders vs Tracey Harbour / Jen Barton6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-08vs Voltz PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Lori Hercules vs Renee Ference / Jamie Moss6-1, 7-6
2023-06-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGaye Saunders / Lynn Goldhammer vs Kathy Fick / Lynne McDonough2-6, 2-6
2023-05-22vs McClymont - CCNC 4.0/3.5/3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesLori Hercules / Sandra Florell vs Meagan Lee / Jennifer Fincher6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mary Howard
published
3.45
Mary Bonsall
published
3.37
Charlotte Gallagher
published 3.5
3.37
Lisa Kirkwood
published
3.23
Amy Hastings
published 3.5
2.78
Sandra Florell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Lori Hercules
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Lynn Goldhammer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Gaye Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Leigh Velevis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Florell + Lori Hercules3342% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Goldhammer + Lori Hercules3350% gamesnot enough data
Mary Howard + Lori Hercules3249% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Goldhammer + Gaye Saunders033 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Goldhammer + Mary Howard123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Hastings + Mary Howard303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Howard
49W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Mary Bonsall
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Charlotte Gallagher
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Lisa Kirkwood
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Amy Hastings
14W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.23
3
Sandra Florell
18W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lori Hercules
20W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Lynn Goldhammer
20W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Gaye Saunders
11W–37L career · type S · 4 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
Leigh Velevis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.