Teams

CV-Palm Springs TC/C Cooley & Misskelley

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Patricia Baughman vs Barbara Holmsten / Judy Theriault1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLorene Peirce / Betsy Henningsen vs Ann Tennyson / Sherry Varner6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / MaryKay McCoy vs Barbara Holmsten / Lori Tanking7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLorene Peirce / Betsy Henningsen vs Ann Tennyson / Sherry Varner6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Misskelley / Susan Hansen vs Ann Crampton / Christine Roughan2-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeb Garris / MaryKay McCoy vs Susan D Morin / Laura Agelopoulos6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiane Schlesinger / Lindy Gaylord vs Gayle Friedman / Jennifer Bouffard2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLindy Gaylord vs Ali Travis5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBetsy Henningsen / Andrea Primer vs Holly Simmons / Ann Morford6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChristina Cooley / Lorene Peirce vs Jennifer Ruddell / Julee Moore7-5, 6-4
2025-02-15vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Patricia Baughman vs Shelley Lynch / Denise Roethenmund6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Hansen / Lindy Gaylord vs Linda Moskowitz / Rebecca Ringer6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeb Garris / Andrea Primer vs Nancy Whittaker / Jane LaRue6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs CV-Woodhaven/Matt InderwiescheWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaryKay McCoy / Deb Garris vs Monica Harrington / Loreen Huras7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLorene Peirce / Betsy Henningsen vs Pamela Pedlow / Lanette Hansen6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-18vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/YoungLost 01
L#3 DoublesJessica Inserra / Betsy Henningsen vs Jill Wright / Donna Simpson6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2025-01-11vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/MorinLost 01
L#2 DoublesLorene Peirce / Deb Garris vs Nicolle Lochner / Myriam Wunder6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Betsy Henningsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.45
Andrea Primer
published 3.5
3.42
Diane Schlesinger
published 3.5
3.40
MaryKay McCoy
published
3.39
Deb Garris
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Maribeth Pullman
published
3.24
Christina Cooley
published 3.5
3.24
Carolina Carreno
published 3.5
3.19
Susan Lewis
published
3.13
Jessica Inserra
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Lindy Gaylord
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Meredith Bearov
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Susan Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katherine Misskelley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lorene Peirce
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Baughman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lorene Peirce + Lindy Gaylord404 matchesnot enough data
Lorene Peirce + Betsy Henningsen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betsy Henningsen
45W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.46
3.5
Andrea Primer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Diane Schlesinger
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
MaryKay McCoy
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Deb Garris
83W–69L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Maribeth Pullman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Christina Cooley
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Carolina Carreno
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Susan Lewis
53W–34L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
Jessica Inserra
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Lindy Gaylord
68W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
Meredith Bearov
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Susan Hansen
26W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Misskelley
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorene Peirce
45W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Baughman
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.