Teams

CDTA W M18&OX9.0 5.Glenbrook Stenmark Sun 7 $25

CDTA 2Winter Mixed 18 & Over · CDTA 18 & Over 9.0 Mixed Winter

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Brownson / Daniel Desio vs Erin Kramer / William Wallace1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Ihlanfeldt / Luiz Pedrosa vs Keara Miller / Mark Murillo6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesClaire Buehler / John Laurx vs Christine Campanelli / Andre Gagnon7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brownson / Daniel Desio vs Sarah Monteagudo / Jason Hui7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrenden Lehr / Claire Buehler vs Randi Wind / Youngbin Lim6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Li / Heather Stenmark vs Ayano Nakamura / Ken Sitar1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesDaniel Desio / Michele Ihlanfeldt vs Alice Copland / Bharani Sankar6-4, 5-4
L#2 DoublesHeather Stenmark / Deniz Karacay vs J'Ana Diamond / Joe Gasior2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Laurx / Claire Buehler vs Brittany Ballog / Daniel Lek2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesClaire Buehler / Luiz Pedrosa vs Sonal Matta / Oliver Natarajan3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHeike Spahn / Deniz Karacay vs Keli Wildermuth / Brian Utz4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKerry Nowicki / Ian Barr vs Emma Forman / Andre Gagnon1-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesClaire Buehler / Luiz Pedrosa vs Rachel Stein / Cesar Uribe6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Li / Heather Stenmark vs Kristen Hemmings / Renato Shimabukuro3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBrenden Lehr / Heike Spahn vs Laura Levin / Manik Dewan7-6, 6-1
L#1 DoublesClaire Buehler / Daniel Desio vs Megan Nguyen / Akihiro Okumura3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHeather Stenmark / Luiz Pedrosa vs Marianne Sharping / Youngbin Lim3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKerry Nowicki / Brenden Lehr vs Marialin Lomongo / Andrew Wolfberg2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Brownson / Deniz Karacay vs Megan Crowley Linne / Jacob Mayles7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichele Ihlanfeldt / John Laurx vs Alice Copland / John Mysz2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJohn Li / Heather Stenmark vs Daniel Lek / Brittany Ballog6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · CDTA 18 & Over 9.0 Mixed Winter
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W M18&OX9.0 1.Tam Copland Sun 4 $228020415163
2CDTA W M18&OX9.0 3.Lakeshore Chang Sun 7 $2644141023201
3CDTA W M18&OX9.0 4.River Trails Wright Fri 7:30 $2544131125200
4CDTA W M18&OX9.0 5.Glenbrook Stenmark Sun 7 $252671736259
5CDTA W M18&OX9.0 6.Nielsen Phelps Sun 5 $222661837232
6(DROPPED) CDTA W M18&OX9.0 2.Tam Bhatty Sun 4 $22000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Daniel Desio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.36
Claire Buehler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.32
Deniz Karacay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Emily Shamrock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Brenden Lehr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Elizabeth Brownson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Ian Barr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Luiz Pedrosa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.14
Heike Spahn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
John Laurx
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Heather Stenmark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.09
Michele Ihlanfeldt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Kerry Nowicki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Stenmark + Deniz Karacay2644% games+3.6% vs expected
Deniz Karacay + Heike Spahn3648% games+3.5% vs expected
Daniel Desio + Michele Ihlanfeldt8453% games−0.4% vs expected
Brenden Lehr + Claire Buehler1547% games−3.8% vs expected
Michele Ihlanfeldt + John Laurx3442% games−5.4% vs expected
Kerry Nowicki + Ian Barr8450% games−6.0% vs expected
Heather Stenmark + John Laurx3347% games−7.5% vs expected
Heike Spahn + Brenden Lehr3645% games−8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Desio
35W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
Claire Buehler
115W–77L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Deniz Karacay
102W–71L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Emily Shamrock
123W–81L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Brenden Lehr
18W–33L career · 1 line in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Elizabeth Brownson
85W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Ian Barr
49W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.16
Luiz Pedrosa
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Heike Spahn
168W–151L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
John Laurx
188W–157L career · 3 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Heather Stenmark
278W–260L career · 8 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Michele Ihlanfeldt
93W–117L career · 3 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Kerry Nowicki
94W–111L career · 2 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.