Teams

Team 2

2023 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over Fall · NOVA Tri Level Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-11-02vs Team 8 Sets in the CityWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / McKaye Darling vs Kim Miller / Arial Pegues6-3, 6-3
2023-10-26vs Team 1 TrifectaLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / Stephanie Elsheikh vs Elizabeth Lucchesi / Kristin Reif6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-09-28vs Team 4 Honey DeucesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / Stephanie Elsheikh vs Meghan Tidwell / Karen Hodges6-2, 6-3
2023-09-14vs MidAtlantic/Kim/Tri-Level4.5-3.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeighAnn Jackson / Jill Mote vs Grace Kim / Cindy Pham6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Risell
published 4
3.68
LeighAnn Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Lisa Karlisch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Stephanie Elsheikh
published
2.87
Pam Murphy
published
Mia Elsheikh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LeighAnn Jackson + Lisa Karlisch2640% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cheryl Risell
12W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
LeighAnn Jackson
51W–61L career · 4 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Lisa Karlisch
40W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
3.46
Stephanie Elsheikh
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.40
Pam Murphy
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
2.87
Mia Elsheikh
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.