Teams

MidAtlantic/Kim/Tri-Level4.5-3.5W

2023 NOVA Tri-Level 18 & Over Fall · NOVA Tri Level Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.55 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-27Won 10
W#2 DoublesMarcia Pokrant / Andrea Gevas vs Kim Gess / Maria McDonald6-3, 6-2
2023-11-19vs Team 8 Sets in the CitySplit 11
L#1 DoublesCasey Burdette / Eve Helmer vs Danielle Desfosses / Brooke Simonson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMia Kim / Andrea Gevas vs Alexandra Castleberry / Hisayo Harlan6-2, 6-3
2023-10-26vs Team 4 Honey DeucesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDava Baumann / Eve Helmer vs Michele Krisanda / Lori Reed6-4, 4-4
2023-10-21vs Team 5 Triple Shots 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAshley Xie / Eve Helmer vs Christine Becer / Bavi Sadayappan6-2, 6-1
2023-10-07vs Team 5 Triple Shots 4.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrea Gevas / Denise Weinig vs Sarah Schrieber / Susan Velasco6-3, 6-1
2023-09-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesMarcia Pokrant / Andrea Gevas vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-09-14vs Team 2Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Gevas / Jennifer Mitchell vs Cheryl Risell / McKaye Darling7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Tri Level Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ashley Xie
published 5
4.59
Casey Burdette
published 5
4.52
Caitlin Lee
published 4.5
4.49
Eve Helmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.32
Dava Baumann
published 4.5
4.30
Irene Chen
published 4.5
4.07
Andrea Gevas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Cindy Pham
published 4.5
3.85
Camryn Kim
published 4
3.60
Kirah Yen
published
Joy Wu
published
Karen Taubenslag
published
Kathleen Jeffers
published
Marcia Pokrant
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ashley Xie
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Casey Burdette
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.59
4.5
Caitlin Lee
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.52
5
Eve Helmer
276W–135L career · type D · 3 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
4.49
4.5
Dava Baumann
33W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Irene Chen
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Elizabeth Vermillion
12W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Andrea Gevas
242W–96L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
4.07
4.5
Cindy Pham
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Camryn Kim
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Kirah Yen
42W–29L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Joy Wu
5W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Taubenslag
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Jeffers
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcia Pokrant
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.